Location of core diagnostic information across various sequences in brain MRI and implications for efficiency of MRI scanner utilization.

OBJECTIVE Targeting redundancy within MRI can improve its cost-effective utilization. We sought to quantify potential redundancy in our brain MRI protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective review, we aggregated 207 consecutive adults who underwent brain MRI and reviewed their medical records to document clinical indication, core diagnostic information provided by MRI, and its clinical impact. Contributory imaging abnormalities constituted positive core diagnostic information whereas absence of imaging abnormalities constituted negative core diagnostic information. The senior author selected core sequences deemed sufficient for extraction of core diagnostic information. For validating core sequences selection, four readers assessed the relative ease of extracting core diagnostic information from the core sequences. Potential redundancy was calculated by comparing the average number of core sequences to the average number of sequences obtained. RESULTS Scanning had been performed using 9.4±2.8 sequences over 37.3±12.3 minutes. Core diagnostic information was deemed extractable from 2.1±1.1 core sequences, with an assumed scanning time of 8.6±4.8 minutes, reflecting a potential redundancy of 74.5%±19.1%. Potential redundancy was least in scans obtained for treatment planning (14.9%±25.7%) and highest in scans obtained for follow-up of benign diseases (81.4%±12.6%). In 97.4% of cases, all four readers considered core diagnostic information to be either easily extractable from core sequences or the ease to be equivalent to that from the entire study. With only one MRI lacking clinical impact (0.48%), overutilization did not seem to contribute to potential redundancy. CONCLUSION High potential redundancy that can be targeted for more efficient scanner utilization exists in brain MRI protocols.

[1]  C. Roy,et al.  Cerebral staging of lung cancer: is one single contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence sufficient? , 2014, Neuroradiology.

[2]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Two-tiered approach to MRI for headache: a cost-effective way to use an expensive technology. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  J. Berlin,et al.  Utilization management in radiology, part 1: rationale, history, and current status. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[4]  J. Berlin,et al.  Utilization management in radiology, part 2: perspectives and future directions. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[5]  C. Cassel,et al.  Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. , 2012, JAMA.

[6]  G. Beller.  Tests that may be overused or misused in cardiology: The Choosing Wisely® campaign , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[7]  B. Erickson,et al.  Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[8]  Jean M. Mitchell,et al.  Controlling the Escalating Use of Advanced Imaging , 2009, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[9]  A. Winter,et al.  Paying accurately for imaging services in medicare. , 2008, Health affairs.

[10]  N. McKay,et al.  Evidence-based imaging guidelines and Medicare payment policy. , 2007, Health services research.

[11]  Cheryl L. Johnson,et al.  Stopping verbal abuse in the workplace. , 2007, The American journal of nursing.

[12]  K. Lau,et al.  Stratification of radiological test ordering: its usefulness in reducing unnecessary tests with consequential reduction in costs. , 2006, Australasian radiology.

[13]  Pablo R Ros,et al.  Utilization management in radiology: basic concepts and applications. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[14]  M. Mainiero.  Incorporating ACR Practice Guidelines, Technical Standards, and Appropriateness Criteria into resident education. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[15]  M. Gado,et al.  Evaluation of a reduced MR imaging sequencing protocol in adult patients with stroke. , 2001, Radiology.

[16]  A. Langman,et al.  Accuracy of fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma. , 1999, American journal of otolaryngology.

[17]  H. Harnsberger,et al.  Ultra high resolution nonenhanced fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging: Cost-effective screening for acoustic neuroma in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss , 1998, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[18]  D. A. Bell,et al.  Low-cost high-resolution fast spin-echo MR of acoustic schwannoma: an alternative to enhanced conventional spin-echo MR? , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[19]  G. Choy,et al.  Utilization Management in Radiology , 2017 .

[20]  J. Chrisinger,et al.  A two-tiered approach to MRI for hearing loss: incremental cost of a comprehensive MRI over high-resolution T2-weighted imaging. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  R. Timmerman,et al.  Which MR imaging sequences are necessary in determining the need for radiation therapy for cord compression? A prospective study. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  T. Ledin,et al.  MRI screening of the cerebellopontine angle and inner ear with fast spin-echo T2 technique. , 2000, Archives italiennes de biologie.