Dual echo EPI – The method of choice for fMRI in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities?

FMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex or the inferior temporal lobes are often compromised by susceptibility artefacts, which may result in signal reduction or loss in gradient echo (GE) EPI. Spin echo (SE) EPI is considerably more robust against susceptibility-related signal loss, but its intrinsic sensitivity to changes in the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast is generally lower. In this study, we performed a direct comparison of GE and SE fMRI using a single-shot dual echo EPI acquisition scheme. Transient hypercapnia, induced by breathing Carbogen (5% CO(2), 95% O(2)), was used as a global physiological stimulus to alter the BOLD contrast. In regions affected by magnetic field inhomogeneities, SE EPI provided significantly higher BOLD sensitivity than GE EPI. Such regions included the orbitofrontal cortex, temporal pole, anterior inferior temporal cortex, as well as parts of the lateral inferior temporal cortex and the lateral cerebellum. Dual echo fMRI benefits from the robustness of SE EPI in these critical regions while utilising the generally higher sensitivity of GE EPI in normal regions. It therefore provides an attractive solution for fMRI studies that require optimum sensitivity in both normal and critical brain regions. Furthermore, a general method is proposed to combine the GE and SE data into a single hybrid data set that provides optimum sensitivity in the whole brain. This method can be applied to any experimental design that can be expressed in terms of a generalised linear model. The feasibility of this approach is demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally.

[1]  J. Frahm,et al.  Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  P. Stroman,et al.  Spin-echo versus gradient-echo fMRI with short echo times. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  David G Norris,et al.  Fast spin echo sequences for BOLD functional MRI , 2007, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[4]  Mark J. Lowe,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Functional Contrast from BOLD-Weighted Spin-Echo and Gradient-Echo Echoplanar Imaging at 1.5 Tesla and H215O PET in the Whole Brain , 2000, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  Luke Bloy,et al.  Spatial sensitivity and temporal response of spin echo and gradient echo bold contrast at 3 T using peak hemodynamic activation time , 2005, NeuroImage.

[6]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Robust detection of ocular dominance columns in humans using Hahn Spin Echo BOLD functional MRI at 7 Tesla , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  Roel H. R. Deckers,et al.  Quantifying the spatial resolution of the gradient echo and spin echo BOLD response at 3 Tesla , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Compensation of Susceptibility-Induced BOLD Sensitivity Losses in Echo-Planar fMRI Imaging , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  Benedikt A. Poser,et al.  Investigating the benefits of multi-echo EPI for fMRI at 7 T , 2009, NeuroImage.

[10]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Functional NMR imaging using fast spin echo at 1.5 T , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Markus Barth,et al.  Contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) as a quality parameter in fMRI , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  J. Voyvodic,et al.  High‐resolution echo‐planar fMRI of human visual cortex at 3.0 tesla , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[13]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  fMRI of the temporal lobe of the awake monkey at 7 T , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  M. Blinkenberg,et al.  Regional Differences in the CBF and BOLD Responses to Hypercapnia: A Combined PET and fMRI Study , 2000, NeuroImage.

[15]  Toralf Mildner,et al.  Regional differences of fMR signal changes induced by hyperventilation: Comparison between SE‐EPI and GE‐EPI at 3‐T , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  R. Constable,et al.  Composite image formation in z‐shimmed functional MR imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  J. Mugler,et al.  Three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo imaging (3D MP RAGE) , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Toralf Mildner,et al.  An Investigation of the Value of Spin-Echo-Based fMRI Using a Stroop Color–Word Matching Task and EPI at 3 T , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Christian Schwarzbauer,et al.  An evaluation of the use of passive shimming to improve frontal sensitivity in fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  J A Sorenson,et al.  Compensation of susceptibility-induced signal loss in echo-planar imaging for functional applications. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Signal and noise characteristics of Hahn SE and GE BOLD fMRI at 7 T in humans , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  M. Zaitsev,et al.  High resolution single-shot EPI at 7T , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[25]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Reduction of susceptibility artifact in gradient‐echo imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Spin‐echo and gradient‐echo epi of human brain activation using bold contrast: A comparative study at 1.5 T , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[27]  Christine Preibisch,et al.  Functional MRI using sensitivity-encoded echo planar imaging (SENSE-EPI) , 2003, NeuroImage.

[28]  Allen W Song,et al.  Dependence of gradient‐echo and spin‐echo BOLD fMRI at 4 T on diffusion weighting , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[29]  R Turner,et al.  Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[30]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Optimal EPI parameters for reduction of susceptibility-induced BOLD sensitivity losses: A whole-brain analysis at 3 T and 1.5 T , 2006, NeuroImage.

[31]  G. Zannoli,et al.  Temporal and spatial assessment of normal cerebrospinal fluid dynamics with MR imaging. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[32]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Comparison of fMRI activation as measured with gradient- and spin-echo EPI during visual perception , 2005, NeuroImage.

[33]  G. Glover,et al.  Spiral‐in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  S. Posse,et al.  Enhancement of BOLD‐contrast sensitivity by single‐shot multi‐echo functional MR imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Mapping the MRI voxel volume in which thermal noise matches physiological noise—Implications for fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[36]  S. Holland,et al.  NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[37]  V A Stenger,et al.  Three‐dimensional tailored RF pulses for the reduction of susceptibility artifacts in T*2‐weighted functional MRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  Fast, automated, N‐dimensional phase‐unwrapping algorithm , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[39]  Carlo Pierpaoli,et al.  Simultaneous Measurement of ΔR2 and ΔR2* in Cat Brain during Hypoxia and Hypercapnia , 1997, NeuroImage.

[40]  Christian Schwarzbauer,et al.  Positive or negative blips? The effect of phase encoding scheme on susceptibility-induced signal losses in EPI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[41]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex: compensation of susceptibility-induced gradients in the readout direction , 2007, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[42]  R. Ordidge,et al.  Assessment of relative brain iron concentrations using T2‐weighted and T2*‐weighted MRI at 3 Tesla , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[43]  Christian Kolbitsch,et al.  The impact of hypercapnia on systolic cerebrospinal fluid peak velocity in the aqueduct of sylvius. , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[44]  Peter Andersen,et al.  In vivo 1H2O T  †2 measurement in the human occipital lobe at 4T and 7T by Carr‐Purcell MRI: Detection of microscopic susceptibility contrast , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[45]  Ralf Deichmann,et al.  Reduction of susceptibility-induced signal losses in multi-gradient-echo images: Application to improved visualization of the subthalamic nucleus , 2009, NeuroImage.

[46]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Microvascular BOLD contribution at 4 and 7 T in the human brain: Gradient‐echo and spin‐echo fMRI with suppression of blood effects , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[47]  D P Auer,et al.  Signal undershoots following visual stimulation: A comparison of gradient and spin‐echo BOLD sequences , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[48]  D. Norris,et al.  BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: Parallel‐acquired inhomogeneity‐desensitized fMRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[49]  D. Norris Principles of magnetic resonance assessment of brain function , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.