Investigation of Nonlinearity in Hyperspectral Imagery Using Surrogate Data Methods

Although hyperspectral remotely sensed data are believed to be nonlinear, they are often modeled and processed by algorithms assuming that the data are realizations of some linear stochastic processes. This is likely due to the reason that either the nonlinearity of the data may not be strong enough, and the algorithms based on linear data assumption may still do the job, or the effective algorithms that are capable of dealing with nonlinear data are not widely available. The simplification on data characteristics, however, may compromise the effectiveness and accuracy of information extraction from hyperspectral imagery. In this paper, we are investigating the existence of non- linearity in hyperspectral data represented by a 4-m Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer image acquired over an area of coastal forests on Vancouver Island. The method employed for the investigation is based on the statistical test using surrogate data, an approach often used in nonlinear time series analysis. In addition to the high-order autocorrelation, spectral angle is utilized as the discriminating statistic to evaluate the differences between the hyperspectral data and their surrogates. To facilitate the statistical test, simulated data sets are created under linear stochastic constraints. Both simulated and real hyperspectral data are rearranged into a set of spectral series where the spectral and spatial adjacency of the original data is maintained as much as possible. This paper reveals that the differences are statistically significant between the values of discriminating statistics derived from the hyperspectral data and their surrogates. This indicates that the selected hyperspectral data are nonlinear in the spectral domain. Algorithms that are capable of explicitly addressing the nonlinearity are needed for processing hyperspectral remotely sensed data.

[1]  Gail P. Anderson,et al.  Analysis of Hyperion data with the FLAASH atmospheric correction algorithm , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[2]  Thomas L. Ainsworth,et al.  Improved Manifold Coordinate Representations of Large-Scale Hyperspectral Scenes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Spatially Coherent Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction and Segmentation of Hyperspectral Images , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[4]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Spectral unmixing , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[5]  Tian Han,et al.  Investigation of nonlinearity in hyperspectral remotely sensed imagery — a nonlinear time series analysis approach , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[6]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[7]  Dimitris Kugiumtzis,et al.  Surrogate Data Test on Time Series , 2002 .

[8]  H. Kantz,et al.  Nonlinear time series analysis , 1997 .

[9]  I. F. Blake,et al.  The linear random process , 1968 .

[10]  M. Paluš Testing for nonlinearity using redundancies: quantitative and qualitative aspects , 1994, comp-gas/9406002.

[11]  Holger Kantz,et al.  Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: The TISEAN package. , 1998, Chaos.

[12]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[13]  Hao Chen,et al.  Processing Hyperion and ALI for forest classification , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  C. Mobley Light and Water: Radiative Transfer in Natural Waters , 1994 .

[15]  Amit Banerjee,et al.  A support vector method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  S. Sandmeier,et al.  The potential of hyperspectral bidirectional reflectance distribution function data for grass canopy characterization , 1999 .

[17]  Thomas L. Ainsworth,et al.  Exploiting manifold geometry in hyperspectral imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  J. Boardman Automating spectral unmixing of AVIRIS data using convex geometry concepts , 1993 .

[19]  Darryl J. Downing,et al.  Univariate Tests for Time Series Models , 1993 .

[20]  Daniel W. Wilson,et al.  Optical design of a coastal ocean imaging spectrometer. , 2008, Optics express.

[21]  Tian Han,et al.  Nonlinear feature extraction of hyperspectral data based on locally linear embedding (LLE) , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[22]  T. Schreiber,et al.  Discrimination power of measures for nonlinearity in a time series , 1997, chao-dyn/9909043.

[23]  Jincheng Gao,et al.  The effect of solar illumination angle and sensor view angle on observed patterns of spatial structure in tallgrass prairie , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Schreiber,et al.  Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[25]  D. Kugiumtzis,et al.  Test your surrogate data before you test for nonlinearity. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[26]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  An unsupervised artificial immune classifier for multi/hyperspectral remote sensing imagery , 2006, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..