Prediction of Peak Back Compressive Forces as a Function of Lifting Speed and Compressive Forces at Lift Origin and Destination - A Pilot Study

Objectives To determine the feasibility of predicting static and dynamic peak back-compressive forces based on (1) static back compressive force values at the lift origin and destination and (2) lifting speed. Methods Ten male subjects performed symmetric mid-sagittal floor-to-shoulder, floor-to-waist, and waist-to-shoulder lifts at three different speeds (slow, medium, and fast), and with two different loads (light and heavy). Two-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were captured. Linear regression analyses were used to develop prediction equations, the amount of predictability, and significance for static and dynamic peak back-compressive forces based on a static origin and destination average (SODA) back-compressive force. Results Static and dynamic peak back-compressive forces were highly predicted by the SODA, with R2 values ranging from 0.830 to 0.947. Slopes were significantly different between slow and fast lifting speeds (p < 0.05) for the dynamic peak prediction equations. The slope of the regression line for static prediction was significantly greater than one with a significant positive intercept value. Conclusion SODA under-predict both static and dynamic peak back-compressive force values. Peak values are highly predictable and could be readily determined using back-compressive force assessments at the origin and destination of a lifting task. This could be valuable for enhancing job design and analysis in the workplace and for large-scale studies where a full analysis of each lifting task is not feasible.

[1]  Andrew S Merryweather,et al.  A revised back compressive force estimation model for ergonomic evaluation of lifting tasks. , 2009, Work.

[2]  A. Merryweather,et al.  A Calculation of Dynamic Back Compressive Force : A Pilot Study of Identify Load Displacement Velocity Constants , 2008 .

[3]  W. T. Dempster,et al.  SPACE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEATED OPERATOR, GEOMETRICAL, KINEMATIC, AND MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF THE BODY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE LIMBS , 1955 .

[4]  A Burdorf,et al.  Accuracy of measurements for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Applied Ergonomics 29(6) 433-438. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  G Németh,et al.  3D-Location of the L5–S1 Fulcrum in Relation to the Hip , 1989, Spine.

[6]  W S Marras,et al.  Lumbar Motion Response to a Constant Load Velocity Lift , 1990, Human factors.

[7]  M Gagnon,et al.  Biomechanical exploration on dynamic modes of lifting. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[8]  M. M. Ayoub,et al.  A comparison of dynamic- and static-strength models for prediction of lifting capacity. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[9]  이수정 해외산업간호정보 - 미국 산업안전보건연구원(National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) 소개 , 2009 .

[10]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  J. R. Boston,et al.  Body motion during repetitive isodynamic lifting: a comparative study of normal subjects and low-back pain patients , 2003, Pain.

[12]  K. An,et al.  Gait characteristics of patients with knee osteoarthritis. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[14]  M Gagnon,et al.  The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  T R Waters,et al.  Accuracy of measurements for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  J. Woldstad,et al.  Posture prediction for static sagittal-plane lifting. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  William S Marras,et al.  Effect of torso flexion on the lumbar torso extensor muscle sagittal plane moment arms. , 2003, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Dynamic knee loads during gait predict proximal tibial bone distribution. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.