The indivisibility of Freudian object relations and drive theories.

The term "object relations theory" has little meaning unless placed in a context. Left unmodified, it applies to a variety of contradictory theories, many of which leave out or diminish other metapsychological points of view. This paper utilizes an account of an "ordinary" analysand's life and treatment as a context for the close examination of one session, also "ordinary," and undramatic, in order to demonstrate by example the usefulness of the psychoanalytic theory of drives in indivisible relationship with the psychoanalytic theory of object relations which, in turn, are related to all of the other metapsychological points of view.

[1]  L. Rangell On The Theory Of Theory In Psychoanalysis And The Relation Of Theory To Psychoanalytic Therapy , 1985, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[2]  V. Spruiell The Analyst at Work , 2002, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[3]  E. M. Weinshel Some observations on the psychoanalytic process. , 1984, The Psychoanalytic quarterly.

[4]  H. Kohut,et al.  Introspection, empathy, and the semi-circle of mental health. , 1982, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[5]  V. Spruiell Freud's Concepts of Idealization , 1979, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[6]  V. Spruiell Object Relations Theory: Clinical Perspectives , 1979, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[7]  J. A. Arlow,et al.  Fantasy and identification in empathy. , 1974, The Psychoanalytic quarterly.