Symptoms and associated impact in pre- and postmenopausal women with sexual arousal disorder: a concept elicitation study.

BACKGROUND Approximately 26% of adult women in the United States suffer from female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), yet little has been done to compare the experience of FSAD in pre- and postmenopausal women, which is critical to enhance the current understanding of FSAD and inform the development and assessment of treatment options for these patient populations. AIM To explore the experience of condition-associated symptoms and the relative importance of FSAD symptoms, including their severity, bother, and impact, on participants' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in pre- and postmenopausal women with FSAD. METHODS In-depth, qualitative, semistructured concept elicitation interviews were conducted with premenopausal (n = 23) and postmenopausal (n = 13) women who were clinically diagnosed with FSAD by a trained sexual medicine clinician. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription company. Thematic analysis was performed with the assistance of NVivo qualitative analysis software. OUTCOMES Outcomes included qualitative interview data about FSAD symptoms and HRQoL, as well as a comparison between pre- and postmenopausal populations. RESULTS The most frequently reported symptom in both cohorts was "inability or difficulty with orgasm" (premenopausal, n = 21; postmenopausal, n = 13). The symptom that premenopausal women most desired to have treated was lubrication, and for postmenopausal women, it was a lack of lubrication or wetness and loss of feeling/sensation. In total, 21 of 23 premenopausal women and all 13 postmenopausal women reported a lack of feeling or sensation in the genitals. The most frequently reported HRQoL impact in both groups was decreased confidence. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Results from this study suggest that the manifestation and experience of FSAD are similar in pre- and postmenopausal women and that the unmet need for an FSAD treatment in the postmenopausal population is just as great as that of the premenopausal population. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS This study involved in-depth qualitative interviews with a relatively small group of women (N = 36) recruited from only 5 study sites across the United States. CONCLUSION The analysis of qualitative data from the concept elicitation interviews revealed a substantial physical and emotional burden of FSAD, underscoring the need for Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment options for pre- and postmenopausal women with FSAD.

[1]  R. Pyke FDA Decisions on Measures of Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in Women: A History, With Grounds to Consider Clinical Judgment. , 2021, Sexual medicine reviews.

[2]  S. Davis,et al.  Prevalence of Low Sexual Desire With Associated Distress Across the Adult Life Span: An Australian Cross-Sectional Study. , 2020, The journal of sexual medicine.

[3]  R. Nappi,et al.  Female sexual dysfunction (FSD): Prevalence and impact on quality of life (QoL). , 2016, Maturitas.

[4]  C. Ricci,et al.  Prevalence of Female Sexual Dysfunction Among Premenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. , 2016, Sexual medicine reviews.

[5]  Jordan E. Rullo,et al.  Sexual Dysfunction in Women: A Practical Approach. , 2015, American family physician.

[6]  R. Balon,et al.  Female Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder: A Diagnosis Out of Thin Air , 2014, Archives of Sexual Behavior.

[7]  M. Jaafarpour,et al.  Female sexual dysfunction: prevalence and risk factors. , 2013, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[8]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[9]  D. Revicki,et al.  Content validity of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in pre- and postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[10]  R Clinton Webb,et al.  Female sexual dysfunction: therapeutic options and experimental challenges. , 2009, Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry.

[11]  C. Johannes,et al.  Sexual Problems and Distress in United States Women: Prevalence and Correlates , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  R. Costabile Topical Alprostadil for the Treatment of Female Sexual Arousal Disorder , 2006, Women's health.

[13]  I. Goldstein,et al.  Female sexual arousal disorder: new insights , 2000, International Journal of Impotence Research.

[14]  Kerry Chamberlain,et al.  Qualitative Health Psychology: Theories and Methods , 1999 .

[15]  E. Laumann,et al.  Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. , 1999, JAMA.

[16]  I. Goldstein,et al.  Toward a More Evidence-Based Nosology and Nomenclature for Female Sexual Dysfunctions-Part III. , 2019, The journal of sexual medicine.

[17]  L. Derogatis Sexual function and quality of life: endpoints and outcomes. , 2001, The journal of gender-specific medicine : JGSM : the official journal of the Partnership for Women's Health at Columbia.

[18]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .