Optimization of DNA hybridization efficiency by pH-driven nanomechanical bending.

The accessibility and binding affinity of DNA are two key parameters affecting the hybridization efficiency in surface-based biosensor technologies. Better accessibility will result in a higher hybridization efficiency. Often, mixed ssDNA and mercaptohexanol monolayers are used to increase the hybridization efficiency and accessibility of surface-bound oligonucleotides to complementary target DNA. Here, no mercaptohexanol monolayer was used. We demonstrate by differential microcantilever deflection measurements at different pH that the hybridization efficiency peaks between pH 7.5 and 8.5. At low pH 4.5, hydration and electrostatic forces led to tensile surface stress, implying the reduced accessibility of the bound ssDNA probe for hybridization. In contrast, at high pH 8.5, the steric interaction between neighboring ssDNA strands was decreased by higher electrostatic repulsive forces, bending the microcantilever away from the gold surface to provide more space for the target DNA. Cantilever deflection scales with pH-dependent surface hybridization efficiency because of high target DNA accessibility. Hence, by changing the pH, the hybridization efficiency is adjusted.

[1]  Q. Huang,et al.  Binding and degradation of DNA on montmorillonite coated by hydroxyl aluminum species. , 2008, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[2]  J. Gooding,et al.  DNA recognition interfaces: the influence of interfacial design on the efficiency and kinetics of hybridization. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[3]  W. Knoll,et al.  Comparison of surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and quartz crystal microbalance techniques for studying DNA assembly and hybridization. , 2005, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[4]  A. Steel,et al.  Electrochemical quantitation of DNA immobilized on gold. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  S. Balasubramanian,et al.  DNA molecular motor driven micromechanical cantilever arrays. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  M. Calleja,et al.  Observation of spermidine-induced attractive forces in self-assembled monolayers of single stranded DNA using a microcantilever sensor , 2011 .

[7]  Martin Hegner,et al.  Rapid functionalization of cantilever array sensors by inkjet printing , 2004 .

[8]  Arun Majumdar,et al.  Label-free protein recognition two-dimensional array using nanomechanical sensors. , 2008, Nano letters.

[9]  Marilyne Sousa,et al.  Investigating the molecular mechanisms of in-plane mechanochemistry on cantilever arrays. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  N. Davidson,et al.  Kinetics of renaturation of DNA. , 1968, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Z. Tan,et al.  Mechanical properties of DNA biofilms adsorbed on microcantilevers in label-free biodetections. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[12]  H. Lang,et al.  Multiple label-free biodetection and quantitative DNA-binding assays on a nanomechanical cantilever array , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  E. Southern,et al.  Steric factors influencing hybridisation of nucleic acids to oligonucleotide arrays. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  W. Brantley Calculated elastic constants for stress problems associated with semiconductor devices , 1973 .

[15]  W. Grange,et al.  Rapid and label-free nanomechanical detection of biomarker transcripts in human RNA , 2006, Nature nanotechnology.

[16]  T. M. Herne,et al.  Observation of Hybridization and Dehybridization of Thiol-Tethered DNA Using Two-Color Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy , 1997 .

[17]  Bert Müller,et al.  Contractile cell forces exerted on rigid substrates. , 2011, European cells & materials.

[18]  A. Steel,et al.  Immobilization of nucleic acids at solid surfaces: effect of oligonucleotide length on layer assembly. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Javier Tamayo,et al.  Label-free detection of DNA hybridization based on hydration-induced tension in nucleic acid films. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[20]  H. Rothuizen,et al.  Translating biomolecular recognition into nanomechanics. , 2000, Science.

[21]  T. M. Herne,et al.  Characterization of DNA Probes Immobilized on Gold Surfaces , 1997 .

[22]  A K Chakraborty,et al.  Origin of nanomechanical cantilever motion generated from biomolecular interactions. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Wenmiao Shu,et al.  Highly reversible and multi-stage cantilever actuation driven by polyelectrolyte brushes. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  A. Majumdar,et al.  Characterization of grafting density and binding efficiency of DNA and proteins on gold surfaces. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[25]  Liesbet Lagae,et al.  Impact of spacers on the hybridization efficiency of mixed self-assembled DNA/alkanethiol films. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[26]  M. Tarlov,et al.  Independent control of grafting density and conformation of single-stranded DNA brushes , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Ute Drechsler,et al.  Analyzing refractive index changes and differential bending in microcantilever arrays. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[28]  Neng-Hui Zhang,et al.  An energy model for nanomechanical deflection of cantilever-DNA chip , 2008 .

[29]  P. Rouxhet,et al.  Oligo(ethylene glycol) monolayers by silanization of silicon wafers: Real nature and stability. , 2008, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[30]  G. Stoney The Tension of Metallic Films Deposited by Electrolysis , 1909 .

[31]  Peter H Seeberger,et al.  Cantilever array sensors detect specific carbohydrate-protein interactions with picomolar sensitivity. , 2011, ACS nano.

[32]  R. Georgiadis,et al.  The effect of surface probe density on DNA hybridization. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  Arun Majumdar,et al.  Chemomechanics of surface stresses induced by DNA hybridization. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.