A simplified application of systematic field sampling and low‐cost video recording set‐up for viewing disector pairs – exemplified in the rat cochlear nucleus

A description of a simple and efficient way of systematic field sampling along with a low‐cost set‐up for simultaneous viewing of physical disector pairs at the light microscopic level is presented. So far the use of a programmable motorized stage for the former purpose and two projection microscopes for the latter have proved to be the most efficient and fastest solutions, but the relatively high expense of purchasing such equipment constitutes a major impediment to the widespread use of such stereological methods. We describe practical applications of two new cost‐effective alternative approaches derived from existing ones. These approaches are used in estimating the total number of neurones in the cochlear nucleus of the rat and involve the systematic selection of section fields at a magnification significantly lower than the magnification used for counting and a video recording set‐up for comparing section pairs. Apart from providing a cheap way for the implementation of the physical disector, the main feature of the application, which may also encourage its use, is that it provides an efficient and simple design for systematic area sampling without requiring any specialized equipment. The same is true for optical disector designs, where the procedure is simplified even further.

[1]  L. Kubínová,et al.  STESYS software for computer-assisted stereology. , 1998, Physiological research.

[2]  E. Ağar,,et al.  Do Cochlear Nuclei Contribute to Auditory Lateralization? , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[3]  T M Mayhew,et al.  If you assume, you can make an ass out of u and me': a decade of the disector for stereological counting of particles in 3D space. , 1996, Journal of anatomy.

[4]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Unbiased stereological estimation of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  Richard Hollister,et al.  Neuronal loss correlates with but exceeds neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[6]  O. Guntinas-Lichius,et al.  Simplified nerve cell counting in the rat brainstem with the physical disector using a drawing‐microscope , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[7]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect , 1977 .

[8]  Dorph‐Petersen,et al.  Stereological estimation using vertical sections in a complex tissue , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[9]  V. Howard,et al.  Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy , 1998 .

[10]  R. Pascher,et al.  Aspects of the quantitative analysis of neurons in the cerebral cortex , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  H. Gundersen,et al.  The optical rotator , 1997, Journal of microscopy.

[12]  H. J. G. Gundersen,et al.  The new stereological tools: Disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis , 1988, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[13]  B T Hyman,et al.  Stereology: A Practical Primer for Neuropathology , 1998, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[14]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in the subdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator , 1991, The Anatomical record.

[15]  W. Reeves Royal Microscopical Society , 1873, Nature.

[16]  S. A. Smith,et al.  Unilateral eye enucleation in adult rats causes neuronal loss in the contralateral superior colliculus , 1997, Journal of anatomy.

[17]  T. Mayhew Recent applications of the new stereology have thrown fresh light on how the human placenta grows and develops its form , 1997, Journal of microscopy.

[18]  R. Coggeshall,et al.  Do primary afferent cell numbers change in relation to increasing weight and surface area in adult rats? , 1994, Somatosensory & motor research.

[19]  R. Coggeshall,et al.  Methods for determining numbers of cells and synapses: A case for more uniform standards of review , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  H J Gundersen,et al.  Total number of neurons and glial cells in human brain nuclei estimated by the disector and the fractionator , 1988, Journal of microscopy.

[21]  L. Tümkaya,et al.  Estimation of the section thickness and optical disector height with a simple calibration method , 1997 .