Reading and summarizing challenging texts in first and second languages

The thinking processes of 14 adult Anglophone students of French performing challenging reading and summarizing tasks were compared in their first and second languages. Individuals proved to use equivalent proportions of higher-order problem solving strategies while writing and reading in both languages. These varied with people's levels of literate expertise in their mother tongue, correlating with the qualities of written summaries they produced in both languages. Uses of these problem solving strategies appeared unrelated to participants' levels (beginning and intermediate) of second language proficiency. Analyses of the verbal reports reveal thinking processes which are common to reading and summary writing in first and second languages but which appear to vary with people's literate expertise and relevant knowledge. Findings are interpreted in relation to Cummins' (1984) theories of the cross-linguistic interdependence of cognitive-academic skills and Van Dijk and Kintsch's (1983) model of discourse comprehension. Implications are drawn for theories of bilingual cognition, further research, and instruction in second language reading and writing.

[1]  Ellen L. Block.  The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language Readers , 1986 .

[2]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[3]  A. Cohen.  Mentalistic Measures in Reading Strategy Research: Some Recent Findings. , 1986 .

[4]  L. Dawe.  Bilingualism and mathematical reasoning in English as a second language , 1983 .

[5]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[6]  Vivian Zamel.  The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies , 1983 .

[7]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[8]  Alister Cumming,et al.  WRITING EXPERTISE AND SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY , 1989 .

[9]  Francis Mangubhai,et al.  The impact of reading on second language learning. , 1983 .

[10]  Valerie Anderson,et al.  Producing Written Summaries: Task Demands, Cognitive Operations, and Implications for Instruction , 1986 .

[11]  Joanne Devine.  Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading: The relationship between general language competence and second language reading proficiency: implications for teaching , 1988 .

[12]  R. L. Thorndike.  Reading as Reasoning. , 1973 .

[13]  Sandra Lee McKay,et al.  Composing in a second language , 1984 .

[14]  Ann M. Johns,et al.  SUMMARY PROTOCOLS OF “UNDERPREPARED” AND “ADEPT” UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: REPLICATIONS AND DISTORTIONS OF THE ORIGINAL , 1985 .

[15]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[16]  Gary A. Cziko,et al.  Differences in First- and Second-Language Reading: The Use of Syntactic, Semantic and Discourse Constraints , 1978 .

[17]  M. Clarke.  READING IN SPANISH AND ENGLISH: EVIDENCE FROM ADULT ESL STUDENTS , 1979 .

[18]  Valerie Arndt.  Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing , 1987 .

[19]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[20]  K. Thompson.  Cognitive and Analytical Psychology Howard Gardner .Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York, Basic Books, 1983. , 1985 .

[21]  Jim Cummins,et al.  Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy , 1985 .

[22]  J. Hayes,et al.  Images, Plans, and Prose , 1984 .

[23]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  Background Knowledge: Context and Familiarity in Reading Comprehension. , 1983 .

[24]  C. Frederiksen.  Discourse Comprehension and Early Reading. , 1976 .

[25]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  The Process of Constructing Main Ideas From Text , 1985 .

[26]  Ann Raimes,et al.  Language Proficiency, Writing Ability, and Composing Strategies: A Study of ESL College Student Writers† , 1987 .

[27]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[28]  M. Clarke.  The Short Circuit Hypothesis of esl Reading—or When Language Competence Interferes with Reading Performance , 1980 .

[29]  F. Schmalhofer,et al.  Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional and situational representations , 1986 .