Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation to conventional mechanical ventilation in the early management of smoke inhalation injury in swine*

Objective:The role of airway pressure release ventilation in the management of early smoke inhalation injury has not been studied. We compared the effects of airway pressure release ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation on oxygenation in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by wood smoke inhalation. Design:Prospective animal study. Setting:Government laboratory animal intensive care unit. Patients:Thirty-three Yorkshire pigs. Interventions:Smoke inhalation injury. Measurements and Main Results:Anesthetized female Yorkshire pigs (n = 33) inhaled room-temperature pine-bark smoke. Before injury, the pigs were randomized to receive conventional mechanical ventilation (n = 15) or airway pressure release ventilation (n = 12) for 48 hrs after smoke inhalation. As acute respiratory distress syndrome developed (PaO2/Fio2 ratio <200), plateau pressures were limited to <35 cm H2O. Six uninjured pigs received conventional mechanical ventilation for 48 hrs and served as time controls. Changes in PaO2/Fio2 ratio, tidal volume, respiratory rate, mean airway pressure, plateau pressure, and hemodynamic variables were recorded. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. PaO2/Fio2 ratio was lower in airway pressure release ventilation vs. conventional mechanical ventilation pigs at 12, 18, and 24 hrs (p < .05) but not at 48 hrs. Tidal volumes were lower in conventional mechanical ventilation animals between 30 and 48 hrs post injury (p < .05). Respiratory rates were lower in airway pressure release ventilation at 24, 42, and 48 hrs (p < .05). Mean airway pressures were higher in airway pressure release ventilation animals between 6 and 48 hrs (p < .05). There was no difference in plateau pressures, hemodynamic variables, or survival between conventional mechanical ventilation and airway pressure release ventilation pigs. Conclusions:In this model of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by severe smoke inhalation in swine, airway pressure release ventilation-treated animals developed acute respiratory distress syndrome faster than conventional mechanical ventilation-treated animals, showing a lower PaO2/Fio2 ratio at 12, 18, and 24 hrs after injury. At other time points, PaO2/Fio2 ratio was not different between conventional mechanical ventilation and airway pressure release ventilation.

[1]  A. Mason,et al.  The morphology of smoke inhalation injury in sheep. , 1991, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  W. Clark,et al.  The Effect of Smoke Inhalation on Pulmonary Surfactant , 1980, Annals of surgery.

[3]  L. Cancio,et al.  Inhalation injury: Pathophysiology and clinical care Proceedings of a Symposium Conducted at the Trauma , 2007 .

[4]  J. Zwischenberger,et al.  High-Frequency Percussive Ventilation With Systemic Heparin Improves Short-Term Survival in a LD100 Sheep Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome , 2006, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[5]  Z. Fu,et al.  Comparison of conventional mandatory ventilation and high frequency oscillatory ventilation for treatment of acute lung injury induced by steam inhalation injury. , 2006, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[6]  R. Burns,et al.  Preliminary experience with airway pressure release ventilation in a trauma/surgical intensive care unit. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  W. Peruzzi,et al.  Airway pressure release ventilation in severe acute respiratory failure. , 1991, Chest.

[8]  K. Chung,et al.  Critical care in the severely burned: Organ support and management of complications , 2012 .

[9]  R. Fowler,et al.  Oscillation After Inhalation: High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Burn Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Co-Existing Smoke Inhalation Injury , 2009, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[10]  R. Kirby,et al.  Airway pressure release ventilation during acute lung injury: A prospective multicenter trial , 1991, Critical care medicine.

[11]  H. Rinka,et al.  The Impact of Spontaneous Ventilation on Distribution of Lung Aeration in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Versus Pressure Support Ventilation , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  D. Herndon,et al.  Analysis of pulmonary microvascular permeability after smoke inhalation. , 1991, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  D. Schoenfeld,et al.  Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  G. Nieman,et al.  Wood smoke inhalation causes alveolar instability in a dose-dependent fashion. , 2005, Respiratory care.

[15]  Michael A Dubick,et al.  Assessment of severity of ovine smoke inhalation injury by analysis of computed tomographic scans. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  Ehab Daoud,et al.  Airway pressure release ventilation , 2007, Annals of thoracic medicine.

[17]  D. Herndon,et al.  The pathophysiology of smoke inhalation injury in a sheep model. , 1984, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  Ognjen Gajic,et al.  Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[19]  Luciano Gattinoni,et al.  The concept of “baby lung” , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[20]  Marek Ancukiewicz,et al.  Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  C. Putensen,et al.  Spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support improves ventilation-perfusion distributions in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[22]  C. Carvalho,et al.  Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Fraser,et al.  Effect of smoke inhalation on viscoelastic properties and ventilation distribution in sheep. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  J. Marini,et al.  Bench-to-bedside review: Microvascular and airspace linkage in ventilator-induced lung injury , 2003, Critical care.

[25]  W. Cioffi,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Smoke Inhalation , 1995, Journal of intensive care medicine.

[26]  A. Mason,et al.  Chapter 3 – Epidemiological, demographic, and outcome characteristics of burn injury , 2007 .

[27]  L. Cancio Current concepts in the pathophysiology and treatment of inhalation injury , 2005 .

[28]  N. Habashi,et al.  Other approaches to open-lung ventilation: Airway pressure release ventilation , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[29]  J. Marini,et al.  Mean airway pressure: Physiologic determinants and clinical importance‐Part 2 Clinical implications , 1992, Critical care medicine.

[30]  J. Korevaar,et al.  Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with conventional tidal volumes for patients without acute lung injury: a preventive randomized controlled trial , 2010, Critical care.

[31]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  ARDS in patients with thermal injury , 1999, Intensive Care Medicine.

[32]  D. Herndon,et al.  Time course of alterations in lung lymph and bronchial blood flows after inhalation injury. , 1990, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[33]  F. Jardin,et al.  Improved prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome 15 years on , 1999, Intensive Care Medicine.

[34]  M. Sydow,et al.  Long-term effects of two different ventilatory modes on oxygenation in acute lung injury. Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation and volume-controlled inverse ratio ventilation. , 1994, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[35]  K. Fitzgerald,et al.  Inhalation injuries. , 1990, AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing.

[36]  David M. Shade,et al.  Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing traditional versus reduced tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[37]  W. Mcmanus,et al.  High-frequency percussive ventilation in patients with inhalation injury. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[38]  D. Schoenfeld,et al.  Meta-analysis of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome trials. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.