Storm hazard analysis over extended geospatial grids utilizing surrogate models

Abstract The use of surrogate modeling techniques for storm surge estimation is providing unique opportunities for coastal hazard analysis and risk assessment. Specifically, surrogate models can support a comprehensive estimation of the coastal hazard/risk utilizing ensembles with large number of storm simulations. A critical challenge in this assessment is the high-dimensionality of the output, which needs to be handled efficiently both in terms of computational burden and, especially in the context of automated risk assessment tools, of memory requirements. Though dimensionality reduction techniques, like Principal Component Analysis (PCA), can address this challenge for the surrogate model calibration, the same does not apply for the hazard/risk estimation performed using the trained surrogate model. In this paper, the estimation of coastal risk using large storm ensemble predictions is examined for domains with hundreds of thousands of point locations (nodes of the grid for the storm surge computational model) for which the corresponding hazard curves need to be provided. This is achieved by exploiting their geospatial distribution and their surge response correlations within the high dimensional original output. K-means clustering is adopted to identify a small subset of nodes to serve as basis for the hazard estimation: instead of calculating the response for the storm ensemble over the entire grid, and then calculating the hazard curves, the hazard curves are first produced for this small subset, and then interpolated over the original grid. Kriging is examined for the latter geospatial interpolation, and its formulation is enhanced to support the desired application, with modifications established for both the calibration stage, as well as the efficient implementation of the interpolation. Additionally, different variants are examined for the clustering stage using information from: (i) the spatial structure of the grid, (ii) the characteristics of the response variability across the geographical domain, and (iii) the combination of the above two. A comprehensive framework is presented integrating both the surrogate model development and the hurricane hazard estimation, with the computational benefits offered in the latter estimation by the use of a small subset of nodes discussed in detail. A validation study is performed utilizing the Coastal Hazards System’s (CHS) North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study (NACCS) database. It is shown that the achieved numerical efficiency is significant, offering a 50 – 250-fold reduction of the computational burden with only a moderate impact on the accuracy of the estimated hazard curves.

[1]  J. Wiart,et al.  Polynomial-Chaos-based Kriging , 2015, 1502.03939.

[2]  Charles Vardeman,et al.  CyberEye: Development of integrated cyber-infrastructure to support rapid hurricane risk assessment , 2014 .

[3]  Robert B. Gramacy,et al.  Cases for the nugget in modeling computer experiments , 2010, Statistics and Computing.

[4]  Denise H. Bauer,et al.  Influence of potential sea level rise on societal vulnerability to hurricane storm-surge hazards, Sarasota County, Florida , 2010 .

[5]  Peter Challenor,et al.  Computational Statistics and Data Analysis the Effect of the Nugget on Gaussian Process Emulators of Computer Models , 2022 .

[6]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox , 2002 .

[7]  Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo,et al.  Coastal Hazards System: A Probabilistic Coastal Hazard Analysis Framework , 2020, Journal of Coastal Research.

[8]  Jeffrey A. Melby,et al.  Advances in surrogate modeling for storm surge prediction: storm selection and addressing characteristics related to climate change , 2018, Natural Hazards.

[9]  Robert E Jensen,et al.  North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study (NACCS) coastal storm model simulations : waves and water levels , 2015 .

[10]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[11]  P. Gardoni,et al.  Probabilistic formulation for storm surge predictions , 2020 .

[12]  Christopher W. Reed,et al.  Efficient joint-probability methods for hurricane surge frequency analysis , 2010 .

[13]  Sanjay Ranka,et al.  An effic ient k-means clustering algorithm , 1997 .

[14]  Donald T. Resio,et al.  STWAVE: Steady-State Spectral Wave Model User's Manual for STWAVE, Version 3.0 , 2001 .

[15]  Jeffrey A. Melby,et al.  Surrogate modeling for peak or time-dependent storm surge prediction over an extended coastal region using an existing database of synthetic storms , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[16]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[17]  T. Kijewski-Correa,et al.  Coastal homeowners in a changing climate , 2018, Climatic Change.

[18]  R. Muir-Wood,et al.  Assessing climate change impacts, sea level rise and storm surge risk in port cities: a case study on Copenhagen , 2008 .

[19]  J. Westerink,et al.  Modeling the physics of storm surges , 2008 .

[20]  C. Conrad,et al.  Reassessment of 20th century global mean sea level rise , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Olivier Dubrule,et al.  Cross validation of kriging in a unique neighborhood , 1983 .

[22]  Jeffrey A. Melby,et al.  A time-dependent surrogate model for storm surge prediction based on an artificial neural network using high-fidelity synthetic hurricane modeling , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[23]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Incorporation of sea level rise in storm surge surrogate modeling , 2020, Natural Hazards.

[24]  Andrew Kennedy,et al.  Geospatial Environments for Hurricane Risk Assessment: Applications to Situational Awareness and Resilience Planning in New Jersey , 2020, Frontiers in Built Environment.

[25]  Roger Woodard,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging , 1999, Technometrics.

[26]  J. Irish,et al.  A hurricane surge risk assessment framework using the joint probability method and surge response functions , 2017, Natural Hazards.

[27]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Kriging metamodeling for approximation of high-dimensional wave and surge responses in real-time storm/hurricane risk assessment , 2013 .

[28]  J. Irish,et al.  A surge response function approach to coastal hazard assessment. Part 2: Quantification of spatial attributes of response functions , 2009 .

[29]  Donald T. Resio,et al.  A surge response function approach to coastal hazard assessment – part 1: basic concepts , 2009 .

[30]  Michelle Bensi,et al.  Application of surrogate models in estimation of storm surge: A comparative assessment , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..

[31]  David R Johnson,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Imputing Non-Wetting Storm Surge to Improve Hazard Characterization , 2020, Water.

[32]  N. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[33]  Wei Chen,et al.  Leveraging the nugget parameter for efficient Gaussian process modeling , 2018 .

[34]  Jérémy Rohmer,et al.  Dynamic parameter sensitivity in numerical modelling of cyclone-induced waves: a multi-look approach using advanced meta-modelling techniques , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[35]  Joannes J. Westerink,et al.  The effect of uncertainty on estimates of hurricane surge hazards , 2012, Natural Hazards.