Orthogonal least squares algorithm for the multiple-measurement vectors problem

The multiple signal classification (MUSIC) algorithm, which was originally proposed to solve the direction of arrival (DOA) estimation problem in sensor array processing, has attracted much attention in recent years as a method to solve the multiple-measurement vectors (MMV) problem. While MUSIC reliably reconstructs the row sparse signals in the full row rank case, it performs poor in the rank deficient case. In order to overcome the limitation of MUSIC, we propose a robust greedy algorithm, henceforth referred to as an MMV orthogonal least squares (MMV-OLS) algorithm, for the MMV problem. Our analysis shows that in the full row rank case, MMV-OLS guarantees exact reconstruction of any row K-sparse signals from K + 1 measurements, which is in fact optimal since K + 1 is the smallest number of measurements to recover the row K-sparse matrices. In addition, we show that the recovery performance of MMV-OLS is competitive even in the rank deficient case by providing empirical results.

[1]  Jian Wang,et al.  Nearly Optimal Bounds for Orthogonal Least Squares , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[3]  Y. Bresler,et al.  Spectrum-blind minimum-rate sampling and reconstruction of 2-D multiband signals , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[4]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  iMUSIC: Iterative MUSIC Algorithm for Joint Sparse Recovery with Any Rank , 2010, ArXiv.

[5]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Compressive MUSIC: Revisiting the Link Between Compressive Sensing and Array Signal Processing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Jian Wang,et al.  On the Recovery Limit of Sparse Signals Using Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Ping Feng,et al.  Spectrum-blind minimum-rate sampling and reconstruction of multiband signals , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings.

[8]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: a re-weighted minimum norm algorithm , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[10]  Jun Won Choi,et al.  Statistical Recovery of Simultaneously Sparse Time-Varying Signals From Multiple Measurement Vectors , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Jian Wang,et al.  Generalized Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  I F Gorodnitsky,et al.  Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Dong In Kim,et al.  Compressed Sensing for Wireless Communications: Useful Tips and Tricks , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[14]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[15]  Jian Wang,et al.  Recovery of Sparse Signals Using Multiple Orthogonal Least Squares , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Liwei Wang,et al.  Subspace distance analysis with application to adaptive Bayesian algorithm for face recognition , 2006, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Rank Awareness in Joint Sparse Recovery , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[18]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Subspace Methods for Joint Sparse Recovery , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[19]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part I: Greedy pursuit , 2006, Signal Process..

[20]  Jeffrey D. Blanchard,et al.  Greedy Algorithms for Joint Sparse Recovery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.