A sensory ecological perspective on mate sampling strategies: simulation models and an empirical test
暂无分享,去创建一个
Rohini Balakrishnan | Diptarup Nandi | Megha Suswaram | R. Balakrishnan | Diptarup Nandi | M. Suswaram
[1] M. Milinski,et al. Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[2] H. Gerhardt,et al. Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) , 2002 .
[3] William E. Wagner,et al. Experience Affects Female Responses to Male Song in the Variable Field Cricket Gryllus lineaticeps (Orthoptera, Gryllidae) , 2001 .
[4] Natasha Mhatre,et al. Phonotactic walking paths of field crickets in closed-loop conditions and their simulation using a stochastic model , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[5] Barney Luttbeg,et al. A Comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice , 1996 .
[6] J. Byers,et al. A Large Cost of Female Mate Sampling in Pronghorn , 2005, The American Naturalist.
[7] Male behaviour over the season in a wild population of the field cricket Gryllus campestris L. , 2007 .
[8] P. Wickman,et al. An estimate of female mate searching costs in the lekking butterfly Coenonympha pamphilus , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[9] D. Blumstein. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .
[10] J. Slate,et al. Natural and Sexual Selection in a Wild Insect Population , 2010, Science.
[11] R. Meldola. Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.
[12] J. Kotiaho,et al. Mate choice for indirect genetic benefits: scrutiny of the current paradigm , 2007 .
[13] I. Cuthill,et al. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[14] Only distance matters – non-choosy females in a poison frog population , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.
[15] Daniel D Wiegmann,et al. Mate choice and uncertainty in the decision process. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.
[16] R. Gibson,et al. How do animals choose their mates? , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[17] Eldridge S. Adams,et al. Active mate choice at cock-of-the-rock leks: tactics of sampling and comparison , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[18] R. Balakrishnan,et al. Male spacing behaviour and acoustic interactions in a field cricket: implications for female mate choice , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[19] L. Real. Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination , 1990, The American Naturalist.
[20] Y. Lubin,et al. High male mate search costs and a female-biased sex ratio shape the male mating strategy in a desert spider , 2011, Animal Behaviour.
[21] Daniel D. Wiegmann,et al. Search behaviour and mate choice by female field crickets, Gryllus integer , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[22] L. Real,et al. Some Distinguishing Features of Models of Search Behavior and Mate Choice , 1996, The American Naturalist.
[23] Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Field Cricket Calling Behaviour: Implications for Female Mate Search and Mate Choice , 2016, PloS one.
[24] Mate Sampling and Assessment Procedures in Female Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) , 2010 .
[25] G. Patricelli,et al. Complex Mate Searching in the Satin Bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus , 2001, The American Naturalist.
[26] J. Stamps,et al. Female Mate Choice Tactics in A Resource‐Based Mating System: Field Tests of Alternative Models , 1997, The American Naturalist.
[27] T. Tregenza,et al. Guarding Males Protect Females from Predation in a Wild Insect , 2011, Current Biology.
[28] M. Milinski,et al. Costs influences sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[29] Anja C. Schunke,et al. Quantitative shape analysis with weighted covariance estimates for increased statistical efficiency , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.
[30] R. Balakrishnan,et al. Predicting acoustic orientation in complex real-world environments , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[31] Call Intensity and Female Preferences in the European Green Toad , 2000 .
[32] T. Amundsen,et al. Mate sampling behaviour of female pied flycatchers: evidence for active mate choice , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[33] M. Kasumovic,et al. Risky mate search and mate preference in the golden orb-web spider (Nephila plumipes) , 2007 .
[34] Y. Dombrovsky,et al. On Adaptive Search and Optimal Stopping in Sequential Mate Choice , 1994, The American Naturalist.
[35] S. Dale,et al. Competition for a mate restricts mate search of female pied flycatchers , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[36] I. Booksmythe,et al. Mate‐sampling costs and sexy sons , 2015, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[37] R. Johnstone. The tactics of mutual mate choice and competitive search , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[38] Mate sampling behaviour of black grouse females (Tetrao tetrix) , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[39] Daniel D Wiegmann,et al. Mate choice and optimal search behavior: fitness returns under the fixed sample and sequential search strategies. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.
[40] J. M. Black,et al. Mate-selection behaviour and sampling strategies in geese , 1993, Animal Behaviour.
[41] T. G. Forrest,et al. SEXUAL SELECTION AND FEMALE CHOICE IN MOLE CRICKETS (SCAPTERISCUS: GRYLLOTALPIDAE): MODELLING THE EFFECTS OF INTENSITY AND MALE SPACING , 1991 .
[42] S. Bensch,et al. Evidence for active female choice in a polygynous warbler , 1992, Animal Behaviour.
[43] Crow White,et al. Ecologists should not use statistical significance tests to interpret simulation model results , 2014 .
[44] E. Forsgren. Mate sampling in a population of sand gobies , 1997, Animal Behaviour.
[45] H. Kokko,et al. Unifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection , 2006 .
[46] A. Janetos. Strategies of female mate choice: A theoretical analysis , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[47] M. Petrie,et al. Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains , 1991, Animal Behaviour.
[48] Call intensity is a repeatable and dominant acoustic feature determining male call attractiveness in a field cricket , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[49] William E. Wagner,et al. Mate sampling strategy in a field cricket: evidence for a fixed threshold strategy with last chance option , 2011, Animal Behaviour.
[50] Sergio Castellano,et al. Sampling and assessment accuracy in mate choice: a random-walk model of information processing in mating decision. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.
[51] D. Roff,et al. Bias in the heritability of preference and its potential impact on the evolution of mate choice , 2015, Heredity.
[52] T. G. Forrest,et al. Models of female choice in acoustic communication , 1994 .
[53] John F. Stout,et al. Attractiveness of the maleAcheta domestica calling song to females , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[54] H. Schielzeth,et al. Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.