Sound understanding of environmental, health and safety, clinical, and market aspects is imperative to clinical translation of nanomedicines

Abstract Nanotechnology has transformed materials engineering. However, despite much excitement in the scientific community, translation of nanotechnology-based developments has suffered from significant translational gaps, particularly in the field of biomedicine. Of the many concepts investigated, very few have entered routine clinical application. Safety concerns and associated socioeconomic uncertainties, together with the lack of incentives for technology transfer, are undoubtedly imposing significant hurdles to effective clinical translation of potentially game-changing developments. Commercialisation aspects are only rarely considered in the early stages and in many cases, the market is not identified early on in the process, hence precluding market-oriented development. However, methodologies and in-depth understanding of mechanistic processes existing in the environmental, health and safety (EHS) community could be leveraged to accelerate translation. Here, we discuss the most important stepping stones for (nano)medicine development along with a number of suggestions to facilitate future translation.

[1]  M. Eblan,et al.  Clinical Translation of Nanomedicine. , 2015, Chemical reviews.

[2]  M. Karnovsky,et al.  Glycogen accumulation in polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and other intracellular alterations that occur during inflammation , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  Wendelin J Stark,et al.  Nanoparticles in biological systems. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[4]  Christopher A Lipinski,et al.  Rule of five in 2015 and beyond: Target and ligand structural limitations, ligand chemistry structure and drug discovery project decisions. , 2016, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[5]  Tomasz Puzyn,et al.  How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated? , 2016, Nanoscale.

[6]  J. Weaver,et al.  Closing the gap: accelerating the translational process in nanomedicine by proposing standardized characterization techniques , 2014, International journal of nanomedicine.

[7]  Saber M Hussain,et al.  Characterization of nanomaterial dispersion in solution prior to in vitro exposure using dynamic light scattering technique. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[8]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Nanoscale reference materials for environmental, health and safety measurements: needs, gaps and opportunities , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[9]  John Rumble,et al.  Describing Nanomaterials: Meeting the Needs of Diverse Data Communities , 2012, Data Sci. J..

[10]  Robert Rallo,et al.  An ISA-TAB-Nano based data collection framework to support data-driven modelling of nanotoxicology , 2015, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[11]  S. Svenson,et al.  Clinical translation of nanomedicines , 2012 .

[12]  Arthur G Erdman,et al.  The big picture on nanomedicine: the state of investigational and approved nanomedicine products. , 2013, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[13]  Masoud Jamei,et al.  Recent Advances in Development and Application of Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Models: a Transition from Academic Curiosity to Regulatory Acceptance , 2016, Current Pharmacology Reports.