Optimal planning of structural performance monitoring based on reliability importance assessment

Recently, the effective use of information from structural health monitoring (SHM) has been considered as a significant tool for rational maintenance planning of deteriorating structures. Since a realistic maintenance plan for civil infrastructure has to include uncertainty, reliable information from SHM should be used systematically. Continuous monitoring over a long-term period can increase the reliability of the assessment and prediction of structural performance. However, due to limited financial resources, cost-effective SHM should be considered. This paper provides an approach for cost-effective monitoring planning of a structural system, based on a time-dependent normalized reliability importance factor (NRIF) of structural components. The reliability of the system and the NRIFs of individual components are assessed and predicted based on monitored data. The total monitoring cost for the structural system is allocated to individual components according to the NRIF. These allocated monitoring costs of individual components are used in Pareto optimization to determine the monitoring schedules (i.e., monitoring duration and prediction duration).

[1]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Repair Optimization of Highway Bridges Using System Reliability Approach , 1999 .

[2]  Daniel N. Farhey Bridge Instrumentation and Monitoring for Structural Diagnostics , 2005 .

[3]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes , 1952 .

[4]  E. J. Gumbel,et al.  Statistics of Extremes. , 1960 .

[5]  Carl A. Bowman,et al.  Results of the Fatigue Evaluation and Field Monitoring of the I-39 Northbound Bridge over the Wisconsin River , 2005 .

[6]  Alison B. Flatau,et al.  Review Paper: Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure , 2003 .

[7]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Time-Dependent Bridge Network Reliability: Novel Approach , 2005 .

[8]  Lawrence M. Leemis,et al.  Reliability: Probabilistic Models and Statistical Methods , 1994 .

[9]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost* , 2007 .

[10]  Toula Onoufriou,et al.  Reliability-based importance assessment of structural members with applications to complex structures , 2002 .

[11]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  RELSYS: A computer program for structural system reliability , 1998 .

[12]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Bridge System Performance Assessment from Structural Health Monitoring: A Case Study , 2009 .

[13]  Winson Taam Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Scientists and Engineers , 1999, Technometrics.

[14]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[15]  Andrzej Osyczka,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Single and Multicriteria Design Optimization , 2001 .

[16]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[18]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Use of monitoring extreme data for the performance prediction of structures: Bayesian updating , 2008 .

[19]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Lifetime Multiobjective Optimization of Cost and Spacing of Corrosion Rate Sensors Embedded in a Deteriorating Reinforced Concrete Bridge Deck , 2007 .

[20]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Use of Monitoring Extreme Data for the Performance Prediction of Structures: General Approach , 2008 .

[21]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Introduction to Optimum Design , 1988 .

[22]  Nicholas J. Carino,et al.  Health monitoring of civil infrastructures , 2003 .

[23]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Bridge Safety Evaluation Based on Monitored Live Load Effects , 2009 .