Material evidence: interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects.

Skilled object lifting requires the prediction of object weight. When lifting new objects, such prediction is based on well-learned size-weight and material-density correlations, or priors. However, if the prediction is erroneous, people quickly learn the weight of the particular object and can use this knowledge, referred to as sensorimotor memory, when lifting the object again. In the present study, we explored how sensorimotor memory, gained when lifting a given object, interacts with well-learned material-density priors when predicting the weight of a larger but otherwise similar-looking object. Different groups of participants 1st lifted 1 of 4 small objects 10 times. These included a pair of wood-filled objects and a pair of brass-filled objects where 1 of each pair was covered in a wood veneer and the other was covered in a brass veneer. All groups then lifted a larger, brass-filled object with the same covering as the small object they had lifted. For each lift, we determined the initial peak rate of change of vertical load-force rate and the load-phase duration, which provide estimates of predicted object weight. Analysis of the 10th lift of the small cube revealed no effects of surface material, indicating participants learned the appropriate forces required to lift the small cube regardless of object appearance. However, both surface material and core material of the small cube affected the 1st lift of the large block. We conclude that sensorimotor memory related to object density can contribute to weight prediction when lifting novel objects but also that long-term priors related to material properties can influence the prediction.

[1]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size–weight illusion , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Lighter or Heavier Than Predicted: Neural Correlates of Corrective Mechanisms during Erroneously Programmed Lifts , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Westwood,et al.  Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size-weight illusion. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Johansson,et al.  Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Miles C. Bowman,et al.  Control strategies in object manipulation tasks , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  K. J. Cole Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  S. Lederman,et al.  The material-weight illusion revisited , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  A. Charpentier Experimental study of some aspects of weight perception , 1891 .

[10]  R. Johansson,et al.  Experience Can Change Distinct Size-Weight Priors Engaged in Lifting Objects and Judging their Weights , 2008, Current Biology.

[11]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor prediction , 2001, Current Biology.

[12]  R. S. Johansson,et al.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[14]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Living in a material world: how visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  H. Forssberg,et al.  The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  R. Johansson,et al.  Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  R. Johansson,et al.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  R. Johansson,et al.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions , 1992, Current Biology.

[20]  R. Johansson,et al.  Integration of sensory information during the programming of precision grip: comments on the contributions of size cues , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Sensorimotor control of manipulation , 2009 .

[23]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Brain activity during predictable and unpredictable weight changes when lifting objects. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  R. Johansson,et al.  Factors influencing the force control during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  H. K. Wolfe,et al.  Some effects of size on judgments of weight , 2022 .

[27]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Bayesian integration in force estimation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  R. Johansson,et al.  Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[29]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  H. Ross When is a Weight not Illusory? , 1969, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  Philippe A. Chouinard,et al.  Role of the Primary Motor and Dorsal Premotor Cortices in the Anticipation of Forces during Object Lifting , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.