Finite-element-analysis of different screw-diameters in the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.

A three dimensional finite element model of the mandible was developed to simulate and study the biomechanical loads of osteosynthesis screws in bilateral sagittal osteotomy. Using the finite-element method clinical conditions were simulated. Different bicortical screw configurations and diameters were evaluated. When bite forces were applied, the most stable configuration was found to be a triangular one. This confirms the results found in the literature. A mini screw of 2.0 mm diameter can provide sufficient stability at the osteotomy site after ramus split osteotomy. Even screws with a diameter of 1.5 mm would withstand forces up to 89.5 N, which would not normally be reached by patients after ramus split osteotomy in the early period of healing. Forces exerted by patients after bilateral ramus split osteotomy do not exceed these values. The finite-element analysis appears to be an adequate method to evaluate this clinical question of interest. It might well replace mechanical models and the results are comparable with those reported in the International literature.

[1]  V. Shetty,et al.  Functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies: effects of positional screw size and placement configuration. , 1996, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[2]  B. Spiessl,et al.  New Concepts in Maxillofacial Bone Surgery , 1976 .

[3]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  The Elastic Properties of a Human Mandible , 1987, Advances in dental research.

[4]  M. Urata,et al.  Comparative evaluation of screw configuration on the stability of the sagittal split osteotomy , 1989 .

[5]  H. C. Kim,et al.  Comparison of screw placement patterns on the rigidity of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy: technical note. , 1995, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[6]  A. Hannam,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible. , 1992, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  R. James,et al.  The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems. , 1996, The Journal of oral implantology.

[8]  A. Greenberg,et al.  The effect of screw size and insertion technique on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. , 1994, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[9]  W. L. Foley,et al.  Internal screw fixation: comparison of placement pattern and rigidity. , 1989, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  D. Kohn,et al.  In vitro comparison of parameters affecting the fixation strength of sagittal split osteotomies. , 1995, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  L. Borchers,et al.  Three-dimensional Stress Distribution Around a Dental Implant at Different Stages of Interface Development , 1983, Journal of dental research.

[12]  J. V. Van Sickels,et al.  Stability of orthognathic surgery: a review of rigid fixation. , 1996, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[13]  G. Obeid,et al.  Optimal placement of bicortical screws in sagittal split-ramus osteotomy of mandible. , 1991, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[14]  Jürgen Dankert Numerische Methoden der Mechanik , 1977 .