The effects of firm actions on customers’ responses to product recall crises: analyzing an automobile recall in China

In times of product-harm crises, the involved firms always employ some countermeasures, such as releasing messages relevant to their response actions. To evaluate the influence of these messages on the perceptions and behavioral responses of corporate customers relative to the recalls, we conducted a case study of the Volkswagen automobile recall in China in 2013. Guided by the protective action decision model, we developed a conceptual model to first study customers’ responses to the recall crisis. Based on this model, we further examined the influence of two types of firm actions, namely technical and ceremonial, on the customer crisis-coping process. Results show that product experience, risk perception, and information seeking significantly influence customers’ behavioral intentions during the product recall crisis. Customers in the technical action group exhibit a higher level of risk perception based on their product experience and have a higher likelihood of seeking information. However, information seeking fails to influence their behavioral intentions. Ceremonial actions overcome the disadvantages of technical actions, but customers’ lack of solution information should be met. In this sense, crisis-involved firms are encouraged to employ a combination strategy including the implementation of the two types of firm actions and then promptly release the messages containing both actions.

[1]  Karla K. Gower,et al.  Framing effect on the public's response to crisis: Human interest frame and crisis type influencing responsibility and blame , 2006 .

[2]  Yitong Wang,et al.  Product Quality Risk Perceptions and Decisions: Contaminated Pet Food and Lead‐Painted Toys , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Thomas Kramer,et al.  The Impact of Product Recalls on Future Product Reliability and Future Accidents: Evidence from the Automobile Industry , 2013 .

[4]  W. T. Coombs,et al.  Information and Compassion in Crisis Responses: A Test of Their Effects , 1999 .

[5]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[6]  Michael D. Pfarrer,et al.  Managing the Message: The Effects of Firm Actions and Industry Spillovers on Media Coverage Following Wrongdoing , 2012 .

[7]  Craig W. Trumbo,et al.  Individual‐ and Community‐Level Effects on Risk Perception in Cancer Cluster Investigations , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  Patrick G. Maggitti,et al.  Market Watch: Information and Availability Cascades Among the Media and Investors in the U.S. IPO Market , 2008 .

[9]  L. R. Keller,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Toxic Capsule Crisis in China: Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Responses , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Scot Burton,et al.  The Accuracy of Brand and Attribute Judgments: The Role of Information Relevancy, Product Experience, and Attribute-Relationship Schemata: , 2001 .

[11]  V. Freimuth,et al.  Multiple Health Risk Perception and Information Processing Among African Americans and Whites Living in Poverty , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  J. Sweeney,et al.  The effect of knowledge types on consumer-perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods , 2007 .

[13]  Margôt Kuttschreuter,et al.  Psychological Determinants of Reactions to Food Risk Messages , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[15]  M. Kuttschreuter Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities , 2005 .

[16]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Household Decision Making and Evacuation in Response to Hurricane Lili , 2005 .

[17]  Teun Terpstra,et al.  Does Communicating (Flood) Risk Affect (Flood) Risk Perceptions? Results of a Quasi‐Experimental Study , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  W. T. Coombs,et al.  How should a company respond to a product harm crisis? The role of corporate reputation and consumer-based cues , 2006 .

[19]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Yong Liu,et al.  Does a Firm's Product-Recall Strategy Affect Its Financial Value? An Examination of Strategic Alternatives during Product-Harm Crises , 2009 .

[21]  J. J. Cronin,et al.  Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments , 2000 .

[22]  Mathew L. A. Hayward,et al.  Celebrity Firms: The Social Construction Of Market Popularity , 2006 .

[23]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Citizens’ Perceptions of Flood Hazard Adjustments , 2013 .

[24]  Philippe De Maeyer,et al.  The Informed Society: An Analysis of the Public's Information‐Seeking Behavior Regarding Coastal Flood Risks , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource-Based Theories , 1999 .

[26]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning , 1992 .

[27]  Chingching Chang THE INTERPLAY OF PRODUCT CLASS KNOWLEDGE AND TRIAL EXPERIENCE IN ATTITUDE FORMATION , 2004 .

[28]  V. Mitchell,et al.  Understanding Consumers’ Behaviour: Can Perceived Risk Theory Help? , 1992 .

[29]  E. Blair,et al.  Functional compatibility risk and consumer preference for product bundles , 2006 .

[30]  M. Brucks The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior , 1985 .

[31]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. , 1999, Environmental research.

[32]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  The Liability of Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automobile Industry , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[33]  W. Timothy Coombs,et al.  Attribution Theory as a guide for post-crisis communication research , 2007 .

[34]  A. Roth,et al.  The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance , 2010 .

[35]  J. Gutteling,et al.  Information needs and risk perception as predictors of risk information seeking , 2008 .

[36]  M. Pillutla,et al.  Impact of Product-Harm Crises on Brand Equity: The Moderating Role of Consumer Expectations , 2000 .

[37]  M. Dekimpe,et al.  The Impact of a Product-Harm Crisis on Marketing Effectiveness , 2007 .

[38]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality , 1996 .

[39]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  After the Flood , 2008 .

[40]  C. V. Rossi,et al.  Consumer Reaction to Product Recalls: Factors Influencing Product Judgement and Behavioural Intentions , 2007 .

[41]  Michael K Lindell,et al.  Households' Perceived Personal Risk and Responses in a Multihazard Environment , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[42]  Michael K Lindell,et al.  The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  Tarun Kushwaha,et al.  The Impact of Product Recalls on Future Product Reliability and Future Accidents: Evidence from the Automobile Industry , 2012 .

[44]  Shuili Du,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[45]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Avoiding Bad Press: Interpersonal Influence in Relations between CEOs and Journalists and the Consequences for Press Reporting About Firms and Their Leadership , 2010, Organ. Sci..