Maize Radiation Use Efficiency under Optimal Growth Conditions

Accurate measurement of crop growth and radiation use efficiency (RUE) under optimal growth conditions is required to predict plant dry matter accumulation and grain yield near the genetic growth potential. Research was conducted to quantify the biomass and leaf area index (LAI) accumulation, extinction coefficient, and RUE of maize (Zea mays L.) under conditions of optimal growth. Maize was grown in two environments over five growing seasons (1998-2002). Total aboveground biomass at maturity ranged from 2257 g m -2 in 1998 to 2916 g m -2 in 2001; values that are considerably greater than the biomass achieved in most previous studies on RUE in maize. Peak LAI ranged from 4.8 to 7.8. Maize extinction coefficients during vegetative growth (k) were within the range of recently published values (0.49 ± 0.03), with no clear pattern of differences in k among years. Seasonal changes in interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) were similar across all but one year. Estimates of RUE were obtained using the short-interval crop growth rate method and the cumulative biomass and absorbed PAR (APAR) method. Values of RUE obtained using the two methods were 3.74 (±0.20) g MJ -1 APAR and 3.84 (±0.08) g MJ -1 APAR, respectively, and did not vary among years. This compares to a published mean RUE for maize of 3.3 g MJ -1 of intercepted PAR (Mitchell et al., 1998). Moreover, RUE did not decline during grain filling. Differences in biomass accumulation among years were attributed in part to differences in observed radiation interception, which varied primarily due to differences in LAI. Maize simulation models that rely on RUE for biomass accumulation should use an RUE of 3.8 g MJ -1 APAR for predicting optimum yields without growth limitations.

[1]  J. Greening,et al.  Radiation Measurement , 1970, Nature.

[2]  Jérémie Lecoeur,et al.  Change with time in potential radiation-use efficiency in field pea , 2003 .

[3]  R. Blanchet,et al.  Radiation-use efficiency in biomass accumulation prior to grain-filling for five grain-crop species , 1989 .

[4]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Source : sink ratio and leaf senescence in maize:: I. Dry matter accumulation and partitioning during grain filling , 1999 .

[5]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Effect of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a semi-arid tropical environment II. Radiation interception and biomass accumulation , 1988 .

[6]  M. Westgate,et al.  Enhancing the ability of CERES-Maize to compute light capture , 2003 .

[7]  D. Mortensen,et al.  Ecophysiological characteristics of four maize hybrids and Abutilon theophrasti , 1999 .

[8]  María E. Otegui,et al.  Sowing Date Effects on Grain Yield Components for Different Maize Genotypes , 1995 .

[9]  T. Arkebauer,et al.  Hybrid-maize—a maize simulation model that combines two crop modeling approaches , 2004 .

[10]  In defense of radiation use efficiency: a response to Demetriades-Shah et al. (1992) , 1994 .

[11]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locations. , 1990 .

[12]  R. Loomis,et al.  Yield Potential, Plant Assimilatory Capacity, and Metabolic Efficiencies , 1999 .

[13]  M. Fuchs,et al.  Further discussions on the relationship between cumulated intercepted solar radiation and crop growth , 1994 .

[14]  M. Tollenaar.  POTENTIAL VEGETATIVE PRODUCTIVITY IN CANADA , 1983 .

[15]  J. Monteith.  Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[16]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Dry matter accumulation of maize grown hydroponically under controlled-environment and field conditions , 1984 .

[17]  R. C. Muchow.  Comparative productivity of maize, sorghum and pearl millet in a semi-arid tropical environment I. Yield potential , 1989 .

[18]  F. Andrade,et al.  Sowing date and maize productivity: I. Crop growth and dry matter partitioning , 1994 .

[19]  J. Somsen,et al.  Rapid canopy closure for maize production in the northern US corn belt: Radiation-use efficiency and grain yield , 1997 .

[20]  R. Loomis,et al.  Nitrogen Influences on Yield Determination in Maize 1 , 1986 .

[21]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  An overview of the crop model STICS , 2003 .

[22]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize , 2002 .

[23]  Richard F. Davis,et al.  Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of maize , 2003 .

[24]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency of an Old and a New Maize Hybrid , 1992 .

[25]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency , 1999 .

[26]  R. C. Muchow.  Effect of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a semi-arid tropical environment I. Leaf growth and leaf nitrogen , 1988 .

[27]  R. Bonhomme.  Beware of comparing RUE values calculated from PAR vs solar radiation or absorbed vs intercepted radiation , 2000 .

[28]  E. T. Kanemasu,et al.  A note of caution concerning the relationship between cumulated intercepted solar radiation and crop growth , 1992 .

[29]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Using chlorophyll fluorometry to compare photosynthetic performance of commercial maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids in the field , 1999 .