Dual-step subspace partition for process monitoring

Available sensing measurements in modern industrial process include two significant characteristics: distribution and autocorrelation. Different types of sensing measurements exhibit different characteristics. Moreover, different feature extraction methods are suitable for data with corresponding characteristics. This paper proposes a novel dual-step subspace partition method in order to establish accurate monitoring modeling. In the first step, process variables are divided into Gaussian distribution subspace and non-Gaussian distribution subspace according to data distribution. The second step is conducted on two subspaces obtained in the first step. The Durbin-Watson testing method is used to test the strength of autocorrelation. As a consequence, four subspaces can be obtained: Gaussian and non-autocorrelation (GNA) subspace, Gaussian and autocorrelation (GA) subspace, non-Gaussian and non-autocorrelation (NGNA) subspace, non-Gaussian and autocorrelation (NGA) subspace. Proper feature extraction methods (such as, principal component analysis and independent component analysis) corresponding to distribution and autocorrelation are implemented to monitor each subspace. Then, the comprehensive monitoring indexes are constructed based on Bayesian inference and statistics in each subspace. Finally, the superiority and effectiveness of the proposed method is proved under the Tennessee Eastman process.

[1]  Chunhui Zhao,et al.  Fault-relevant Principal Component Analysis (FPCA) method for multivariate statistical modeling and process monitoring , 2014 .

[2]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis , 1995 .

[3]  Xuefeng Yan,et al.  Gaussian and non-Gaussian Double Subspace Statistical Process Monitoring Based on Principal Component Analysis and Independent Component Analysis , 2015 .

[4]  Manabu Kano,et al.  A new multivariate statistical process monitoring method using principal component analysis , 2001 .

[5]  Michael J. Piovoso,et al.  On unifying multiblock analysis with application to decentralized process monitoring , 2001 .

[6]  Furong Gao,et al.  Review of Recent Research on Data-Based Process Monitoring , 2013 .

[7]  Chi Ma,et al.  Decentralized fault diagnosis using multiblock kernel independent component analysis , 2012 .

[8]  Yu Song,et al.  Distributed Statistical Process Monitoring Based on Four-Subspace Construction and Bayesian Inference , 2013 .

[9]  ChangKyoo Yoo,et al.  Statistical monitoring of dynamic processes based on dynamic independent component analysis , 2004 .

[10]  Hongbo Shi,et al.  Multisubspace Principal Component Analysis with Local Outlier Factor for Multimode Process Monitoring , 2014 .

[11]  ChangKyoo Yoo,et al.  Statistical process monitoring with independent component analysis , 2004 .

[12]  Zhi-huan Song,et al.  Distributed PCA Model for Plant-Wide Process Monitoring , 2013 .

[13]  J. Macgregor,et al.  Analysis of multiblock and hierarchical PCA and PLS models , 1998 .

[14]  Hongbo Shi,et al.  Neighborhood based global coordination for multimode process monitoring , 2014 .

[15]  N. Ricker Optimal steady-state operation of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process , 1995 .

[16]  Hongbo Shi,et al.  Multimode process monitoring using improved dynamic neighborhood preserving embedding , 2014 .

[17]  Furong Gao,et al.  Quality-relevant Fault Diagnosis with Concurrent Phase Partition and Analysis of Relative Changes for Multiphase Batch Processes , 2013 .

[18]  Xuefeng Yan,et al.  Plant-wide process monitoring based on mutual information-multiblock principal component analysis. , 2014, ISA transactions.

[19]  Li Wang,et al.  Multivariate statistical process monitoring using an improved independent component analysis , 2010 .

[20]  Huijun Gao,et al.  Data-Based Techniques Focused on Modern Industry: An Overview , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.