Independent Causal Contributions of Alpha- and Beta-Band Oscillations during Movement Selection

To select a movement, specific neuronal populations controlling particular features of that movement need to be activated, whereas other populations are downregulated. The selective (dis)inhibition of cortical sensorimotor populations is governed by rhythmic neural activity in the alpha (8–12 Hz) and beta (15–25 Hz) frequency range. However, it is unclear whether and how these rhythms contribute independently to motor behavior. Building on a recent dissociation of the sensorimotor alpha- and beta-band rhythms, we test the hypothesis that the beta-band rhythm governs the disinhibition of task-relevant neuronal populations, whereas the alpha-band rhythm suppresses neurons that may interfere with task performance. Cortical alpha- and beta-band rhythms were manipulated with transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) while human participants selected how to grasp an object. Stimulation was applied at either 10 or 20 Hz and was imposed on the sensorimotor cortex contralaterally or ipsilaterally to the grasping hand. In line with task-induced changes in endogenous spectral power, the effect of the tACS intervention depended on the frequency and site of stimulation. Whereas tACS stimulation generally increased movement selection times, 10 Hz stimulation led to relatively faster selection times when applied to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the grasping hand, compared with other stimulation conditions. These effects occurred selectively when multiple movements were considered. These observations functionally differentiate the causal contribution of alpha- and beta-band oscillations to movement selection. The findings suggest that sensorimotor beta-band rhythms disinhibit task-relevant populations, whereas alpha-band rhythms inhibit neuronal populations that could interfere with movement selection. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study shows dissociable effects of 10 Hz and 20 Hz tACS on the duration of movement selection. These observations have two elements of general relevance. First, the finding that alpha- and beta-band oscillations contribute independently to movement selection provides insight in how oscillations orchestrate motor behavior, which is key to understand movement selection deficits in neurodegenerative disorders. Second, the findings highlight the potential of 10 Hz stimulation as a neurophysiologically grounded intervention to enhance human performance. In particular, this intervention can potentially be exploited to boost rehabilitation after neural damage by targeting the unaffected hemisphere.

[1]  R. Dennis Cook,et al.  Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression , 2000, Technometrics.

[2]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Perceptuo-Motor Interactions during Prehension Movements , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Pollmann,et al.  Retinotopic Activation in Response to Subjective Contours in Primary Visual Cortex , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[4]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Selection of wrist posture in conditions of motor ambiguity , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  I. Toni,et al.  Distinct roles for alpha- and beta-band oscillations during mental simulation of goal-directed actions. , 2014, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  I. Toni,et al.  Oscillations , 2018, Physics to a Degree.

[8]  Toralf Neuling,et al.  Friends, not foes: Magnetoencephalography as a tool to uncover brain dynamics during transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[9]  J. Liepert,et al.  Inhibition of ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic generation of low force , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Knight,et al.  Shifts in Gamma Phase–Amplitude Coupling Frequency from Theta to Alpha Over Posterior Cortex During Visual Tasks , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  U. Hess,et al.  Transformations for within-subject designs: a Monte Carlo investigation. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  M. Jeannerod Mental imagery in the motor context , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  P. Brown Abnormal oscillatory synchronisation in the motor system leads to impaired movement , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  Zachary F Mainen,et al.  Preparing and selecting actions with neural populations: toward cortical circuit mechanisms , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  Daniel Schmitt,et al.  Whole Body Mechanics of Stealthy Walking in Cats , 2008, PloS one.

[17]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (α-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  I. Toni,et al.  Body Posture Modulates Action Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Kozo Funase,et al.  Unilateral imagined movement increases interhemispheric inhibition from the contralateral to ipsilateral motor cortex , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Neural discharge and local field potential oscillations in primate motor cortex during voluntary movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  A. Engel,et al.  Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2014, Current Biology.

[22]  L. Parra,et al.  Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity—a review of known mechanisms from animal studies , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  P M Rossini,et al.  Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. , 1997, Stroke.

[24]  David A Rosenbaum,et al.  Grasping movement plans , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Andreas K. Engel,et al.  Different coupling modes mediate cortical cross-frequency interactions , 2015, NeuroImage.

[26]  P. R. Davidson,et al.  Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[27]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Cortical Dynamics of Sensorimotor Integration during Grasp Planning , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[29]  Irene E. Nagel,et al.  Human Aging Magnifies Genetic Effects on Executive Functioning and Working Memory , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[30]  A. Milner,et al.  Grasping the past delay can improve visuomotor performance , 2001, Current Biology.

[31]  Flavio Fröhlich,et al.  Endogenous Cortical Oscillations Constrain Neuromodulation by Weak Electric Fields , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[32]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  T. C. W. Nijboer,et al.  Choosing between alternative wrist postures: Action planning needs perception , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Dynamic Modulation of Local Population Activity by Rhythm Phase in Human Occipital Cortex During a Visual Search Task , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  C. Koch,et al.  Transcranial Electric Stimulation Entrains Cortical Neuronal Populations in Rats , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Jérémie Lefebvre,et al.  Modulation of Cortical Oscillations by Low-Frequency Direct Cortical Stimulation Is State-Dependent , 2016, PLoS biology.

[37]  O. Jensen,et al.  Shaping Functional Architecture by Oscillatory Alpha Activity: Gating by Inhibition , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[38]  J. Krakauer,et al.  A computational neuroanatomy for motor control , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Mu and Beta Rhythm Topographies During Motor Imagery and Actual Movements , 2004, Brain Topography.

[40]  S. Rossi,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Tuning of the Human Motor System Induced by Transcranial Oscillatory Potentials , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Leonardo G. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms Underlying Functional Changes in the Primary Motor Cortex Ipsilateral to an Active Hand , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Apostolos P Georgopoulos,et al.  Coding of movements in the motor cortex , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  Ludovica Labruna,et al.  Nonspecific Inhibition of the Motor System during Response Preparation , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[45]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Christopher J. Honey,et al.  Does rhythmic entrainment represent a generalized mechanism for organizing computation in the brain? , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[47]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Neural Topography and Content of Movement Representations , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  O. Jensen,et al.  Gamma Power Is Phase-Locked to Posterior Alpha Activity , 2008, PloS one.

[49]  G Schlaug,et al.  Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements , 2004, Neurology.

[50]  F. Fröhlich,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modulates Large-Scale Cortical Network Activity by Network Resonance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  B. Balas,et al.  Personal Familiarity Influences the Processing of Upright and Inverted Faces in Infants , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[52]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Simulating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With a Detailed Anisotropic Human Head Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[53]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[54]  Christoph Braun,et al.  Mapping entrained brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2016, NeuroImage.

[55]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. , 2008, Archives of neurology.

[56]  M Hallett,et al.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[57]  Peter Brown,et al.  Boosting Cortical Activity at Beta-Band Frequencies Slows Movement in Humans , 2009, Current Biology.

[58]  Emiliano Santarnecchi,et al.  State-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Oscillatory Currents on the Motor System: What You Think Matters , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  E. Fetz,et al.  Coherent 25- to 35-Hz oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex of awake behaving monkeys. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Computational analysis shows why transcranial alternating current stimulation induces retinal phosphenes , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[61]  R. Cook Detection of influential observation in linear regression , 2000 .

[62]  M. Bikson,et al.  Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[63]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Effects of 10Hz and 20Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on motor functions and motor cortical excitability , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[64]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.