Model based hierarchical optimization strategies for analog design automation

The design of complex analog circuits by using flat optimization-based approaches is inefficient, even impossible, due to the high number of design variables and the growth of the cost of performance evaluation with the circuit size. Over the past two decades, top-down hierarchical design approaches have been developed and applied. They are based on hierarchical circuit decomposition and specification transmission from top-level to lower level blocks. However, such specification transmission is usually performed with little knowledge on the feasibility of the specifications, leading, therefore, to costly redesign iterations. Even if the specification transmission is successful, there is no guarantee that it is optimal in terms of e.g., power consumption or area occupation. To palliate this problem, two novel model-based hierarchical synthesis methods are proposed in this paper: ModelBased Hierarchical Optimization (MBHO) and Improved ModelBased Hierarchical Optimization (IMBHO). They are based on the concurrent design at higher and lower hierarchical levels and appropriate communication between the different processes. Experimental results on a filter example comparing the new approaches and the conventional top-down design approach are provided.

[1]  Georges G. E. Gielen,et al.  Top-Down Heterogeneous Synthesis of Analog and Mixed-Signal Systems , 2006, Proceedings of the Design Automation & Test in Europe Conference.

[2]  Francisco V. Fernández,et al.  Reuse-Based Methodologies and Tools in the Design of Analog and Mixed-Signal Integrated Circuits , 1992 .

[3]  Nuno Horta,et al.  Reconfigurable multi-mode sigma-delta modulator for 4G mobile terminals , 2009, Integr..

[4]  Andreas Kaiser,et al.  Hierarchical sizing and biasing of analog firm intellectual properties , 2013, Integr..

[5]  Rob A. Rutenbar,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling, Optimization, and Synthesis for System-Level Analog and RF Designs , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Helmut E. Graeb,et al.  Constraint-Based Layout-Driven Sizing of Analog Circuits , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[7]  Georges G. E. Gielen,et al.  AMGIE-A synthesis environment for CMOS analog integrated circuits , 2001, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[8]  David Engel A Top Down Constraint Driven Design Methodology For Analog Integrated Circuits , 2016 .

[9]  Günhan Dündar,et al.  Simulation-based analog and RF circuit synthesis using a modified evolutionary strategies algorithm , 2011, Integr..

[10]  Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli,et al.  Support vector machines for analog circuit performance representation , 2003, Proceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451).

[11]  A. Morgado,et al.  Systematic top-down design of reconfigurable ΣΔ modulators for multi-standard transceivers , 2009 .