Scenario analysis for promoting clean cooking in Sub-Saharan Africa: Costs and benefits

Nearly 900 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa rely on traditional biomass for cooking, with negative impacts on health, biodiversity and the climate. In this study, we use the IMAGE modellingframework to construct two sets of scenarios for promoting clean cooking solutions. In the first set, specific policy options to promote clean cooking are evaluated, while in the second the SDG target to achieve universal access to modern cooking energy by 2030 is imposed. The study adds knowledge to understanding the impact of individual policy options on access to clean cooking solutions, and provides insight into synergies and trade-offs of achieving the SDG targets on human health, biodiversity and climate change. The results show that, in the absence of coordinated actions, enabling policies and scaled-up finance, the number of people in Sub-Saharan Africa relying on traditional biomass cookstoves could amount to 660–820 million by 2030. Subsidies on specific clean cooking technologies or fuels could increase their use substantially, but could hinder the uptake of alternative clean cooking fuels or technologies. Meeting the SDG target has considerable social, environmental and economic benefits, and could even lead to lower total fuel expenditures. However, investments in cookstoves need to be quadrupled relative to baseline.

[1]  Omar Masera,et al.  From cookstoves to cooking systems: the integrated program on sustainable household energy use in Mexico , 2005 .

[2]  P. Lucas,et al.  Trade-offs and synergies between universal electricity access and climate change mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2018 .

[3]  Omar Masera,et al.  The carbon footprint of traditional woodfuels , 2015 .

[4]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[5]  B. van der Kroon Climbing the African energy ladder:: internal and external factors influencing household demand for improved cookstoves and modern fuels in sub-Saharan Africa , 2016 .

[6]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Representation of variable renewable energy sources in TIMER, an aggregated energy system simulation model , 2017 .

[7]  B. J. van Ruijven,et al.  Energy and Development - A Modelling Approach , 2004 .

[8]  Jean Chateau,et al.  Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[9]  Francesco Fuso Nerini,et al.  The cost of cooking a meal. The case of Nyeri County, Kenya , 2017 .

[10]  Govinda R. Timilsina,et al.  Household Cooking Fuel Choice and Adoption of Improved Cookstoves in Developing Countries: A Review , 2014 .

[11]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Benefits and Costs of Improved Cookstoves: Assessing the Implications of Variability in Health, Forest and Climate Impacts , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Policy trade-offs between climate mitigation and clean cook-stove access in South Asia , 2016, Nature Energy.

[13]  Katherine L. Dickinson,et al.  An analysis of efforts to scale up clean household energy for cooking around the world. , 2018, Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative.

[14]  Benjamin Sovacool Energy, poverty, and development , 2014 .

[15]  S. Dekker,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Future Growing Demand for Charcoal in the Tropics , 2017, Front. Environ. Sci..

[16]  Srilata Kammila,et al.  Clean and improved cooking in Sub-Saharan Africa : a landscape report , 2014 .

[17]  B. O’Neill,et al.  Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[18]  Jean Hugues Nlom,et al.  Modeling Fuel Choice among Households in Northern Cameroon , 2014 .

[19]  Weiwei Lin,et al.  Factors influencing the adoption and sustainable use of clean fuels and cookstoves in China -a Chinese literature review , 2015 .

[20]  Hilde M. Toonen Adapting to an innovation: Solar cooking in the urban households of Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso) , 2009 .

[21]  Mohammad Hosein Farzaei,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 , 2018, Lancet.

[22]  Bette Hileman,et al.  ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE , 2006 .

[23]  A. Karimu,et al.  Who Adopts LPG as the Main Cooking Fuel and Why? Empirical Evidence on Ghana Based on National Survey , 2016 .

[24]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation , 2018 .

[25]  Fiona Zuzarte,et al.  Market Barriers to Clean Cooking Fuels in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of Literature , 2008 .

[26]  Deger Saygin,et al.  Long-term model-based projections of energy use and CO2 emissions from the global steel and cement industries , 2016 .

[27]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Model projections for household energy use in developing countries , 2012 .

[28]  Wolfgang Lutz,et al.  The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100 , 2017, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[29]  G. Köhlin,et al.  Determinants of Household Fuel Choice in Major Cities in Ethiopia , 2009 .

[30]  K. Neuzil,et al.  Traditional cooking practices and preferences for stove features among women in rural Senegal: Informing improved cookstove design and interventions , 2018, PloS one.

[31]  F. Spertino,et al.  Development and assessment of a solar home system to cover cooking and lighting needs in developing regions as a better alternative for existing practices , 2017 .

[32]  Narasimha D. Rao,et al.  Outlook for modern cooking energy access in Central America , 2018, PloS one.

[33]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment , 2013 .

[34]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Cooking fuel choice in rural China: results from microdata , 2017 .

[35]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Future impacts of environmental factors on achieving the SDG target on child mortality—A synergistic assessment , 2019, Global Environmental Change.

[36]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0 : Model description and policy applications , 2014 .

[37]  K. Kaygusuz Energy services and energy poverty for sustainable rural development , 2011 .

[38]  I. Rampedi,et al.  Household cooking fuel use patterns and determinants across southern Africa: Evidence from the demographic and health survey data , 2017 .

[39]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Exploring the implications of lifestyle change in 2 °C mitigation scenarios using the IMAGE integrated assessment model , 2016 .

[40]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Pathways to achieve universal household access to modern energy by 2030 , 2013 .

[41]  Henri Casteleyn Clean cooking in sub-Saharan Africa: modeling the cooking fuel mix to 2050 , 2017 .

[42]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2014 .

[43]  I. Rampedi,et al.  Nigerian households' cooking energy use, determinants of choice, and some implications for human health and environmental sustainability. , 2016 .

[44]  B. Boardman,et al.  Global Energy Assessment (GEA): Energy, Poverty, and Development , 2012 .

[45]  Haftu Etsay Kelebe,et al.  Determinants for adoption decision of small scale biogas technology by rural households in Tigray, Ethiopia , 2017 .

[46]  Ashok J. Gadgil,et al.  Avoided emissions of a fuel-efficient biomass cookstove dwarf embodied emissions , 2016 .