Electromagnetic interference of GSM mobile phones with the implantable deep brain stimulator, ITREL-III

BackgroundThe purpose was to investigate mobile phone interference with implantable deep brain stimulators by means of 10 different 900 Mega Hertz (MHz) and 10 different 1800 MHz GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) mobile phones.MethodsAll tests were performed in vitro using a phantom especially developed for testing with deep brain stimulators. The phantom was filled with liquid phantom materials simulating brain and muscle tissue. All examinations were carried out inside an anechoic chamber on two implants of the same type of deep brain stimulator: ITREL-III from Medtronic Inc., USA.ResultsDespite a maximum transmitted peak power of mobile phones of 1 Watt (W) at 1800 MHz and 2 W at 900 MHz respectively, no influence on the ITREL-III was found. Neither the shape of the pulse form changed nor did single pulses fail. Tests with increased transmitted power using CW signals and broadband dipoles have shown that inhibition of the ITREL-III occurs at frequency dependent power levels which are below the emissions of GSM mobile phones. The ITREL-III is essentially more sensitive at 1800 MHz than at 900 MHz. Particularly the frequency range around 1500 MHz shows a very low interference threshold.ConclusionThese investigations do not indicate a direct risk for ITREL-III patients using the tested GSM phones. Based on the interference levels found with CW signals, which are below the mobile phone emissions, we recommend similar precautions as for patients with cardiac pacemakers: 1. The phone should be used at the ear at the opposite side of the implant and 2. The patient should avoid carrying the phone close to the implant.

[1]  F. Alesch,et al.  Stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus in tremor dominated Parkinson's disease and essential tremor , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[2]  K A Ellenbogen,et al.  Cellular telephones and pacemakers: urgent call or wrong number? , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  P S Ruggera,et al.  In vitro testing of pacemakers for digital cellular phone electromagnetic interference. , 1997, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[4]  Eorge,et al.  INTERFERENCE WITH CARDIAC PACEMAKERS BY CELLULAR TELEPHONES , 2000 .

[5]  V Barbaro,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference of Analog Cellular Telephones with Pacemakers , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  A. Benabid,et al.  Effect on parkinsonian signs and symptoms of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation , 1995, The Lancet.

[8]  D L Hayes,et al.  State of the Science: Pacemaker and Defibrillator Interference from Wireless Communication Devices , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  Roger G. Camillo,et al.  Electromagnetic filters impede adverse interference of pacemakers by digital cellular telephones , 1996 .

[10]  P S Ruggera,et al.  Cellular Phone Interference Testing of Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators In Vitro , 1998, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[11]  M Santini,et al.  Influence of digital and analogue cellular telephones on implanted pacemakers. , 1997, European heart journal.

[12]  Rebecca A. Steffens,et al.  Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  V Barbaro,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference of Digital and Analog Cellular Telephones with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[14]  F Burkart,et al.  Intermittent pacemaker dysfunction caused by digital mobile telephones. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  ANDREAS WILKE,et al.  Influence of D‐Net (European GSM‐Standard) Cellular Phones on Pacemaker Function in 50 Patients with Permanent Pacemakers , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  G Schmid,et al.  Electromagnetic compatibility of electronic implants--review of the literature. , 2001, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[18]  A. Trigano,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference of External Pacemakers by Walkie‐Talkies and Digital Cellular Phones: Experimental Study , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[19]  W. Irnich,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference of Pacemakers by Mobile Phones , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[20]  A Liebrich,et al.  Is there a risk for interaction between mobile phones and single lead VDD pacemakers? , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[21]  C. Lau,et al.  Interference of cellular phones with implanted permanent pacemakers , 1996, Clinical cardiology.

[22]  HARRY G. MONO,et al.  The Safety of Digital Mobile Cellular Telephones with Minute Ventilation Rate Adaptive Pacemakers , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.