Economic losses due to earthquake - induced structural damages in RC SMRF structures

Abstract This study presents the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures designed to modern buildings codes, for calculating the economic losses due to earthquake-induced structural damages. The structures investigated in the present research considered four (3, 5, 8, and 10 storeys) prototype special moment resisting frame (SMRF) structures designed to Uniform Building Code–97/Building Code of Pakistan. Quasi-static cyclic tests were carried out herein on special moment resisting beams in order to develop damage scale and beam reparability cost ratio. The considered structures were analyzed in a calibrated FE based software SeismoStruct using incremental dynamic analysis procedure employing a set of seven natural design spectrum compatible ground motion records. Damage to structural components was identified for each intensity level and integrated over the whole structure, with the required repair cost, to calculate the structure repair cost ratio (RCR). The structure RCR is correlated with the seismic intensity to develop seismic vulnerability curves, which can be used for the economic loss estimation (direct repairability cost) of SMRF structures given the seismic intensity.

[1]  Alper Ilki,et al.  Seismic Risk Assessment and Retrofitting , 2009 .

[2]  R. Bilham Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: tectonics, geodesy and history , 2004 .

[3]  Panitan Lukkunaprasit,et al.  DUCTILITY ENHANCEMENT OF MODERATELY CONFINED CONCRETE TIED COLUMNS WITH HOOK-CLIPS , 2003 .

[4]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  On the selection by MCDM methods of the optimal system for seismic retrofitting and vertical addition of existing buildings , 2015 .

[5]  William H. Cooper,et al.  Japan's 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami: Economic Effects and Implications for the United States [March 25, 2011] , 2011 .

[6]  Liu Jie-ping,et al.  Elementary Introduction to Eurocode 8-design of structures for earthquake resistance , 2006 .

[7]  Juan Carlos de la Llera,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of the seismic response of RC buildings in Concepción during the February 27, 2010, Chile earthquake , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[8]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[9]  Michael Inwood,et al.  Review of the New Zealand Standard for Concrete Structures (NZS 3101) for High Strength and Lightweight Concrete Exposed to Fire , 1999 .

[10]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Urban habitat constructions under catastrophic events , 2008 .

[11]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Simplified Model for Strengthening Design of Beam–Column Internal Joints in Reinforced Concrete Frames , 2015 .

[12]  T. Rossetto,et al.  Observations of damage due to the Kashmir earthquake of October 8, 2005 and study of current seismic provisions for buildings in Pakistan , 2009 .

[13]  Akhtar Naeem Khan,et al.  A Survey of Damages to Bridges in Pakistan after the Major Earthquake of 8 October 2005 , 2011 .

[14]  Qaisar Ali,et al.  Earthquake loss estimation of residential buildings in Pakistan , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[15]  James L Noland,et al.  Computer-Aided Structural Engineering (CASE) Project: Decision Logic Table Formulation of ACI (American Concrete Institute) 318-77 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete for Automated Constraint Processing. Volume 1. , 1986 .

[16]  Stefano Pampanin Reality-check and renewed challenges in earthquake engineering: Implementing low-damage structural systems - from theory to practice , 2012 .

[17]  W. Y. Kam,et al.  Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 22 February Christchurch (Lyttelton) earthquake , 2011 .

[18]  Charles A. Kircher,et al.  Development of Building Damage Functions for Earthquake Loss Estimation , 1997 .

[19]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Alternative Performance-Based Retrofit Strategies and Solutions for Existing RC Buildings , 2009 .

[20]  Erica Seville,et al.  Organisational Resilience to Natural Disasters: New Zealand's Experience , 2013 .

[21]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[22]  A. Khan,et al.  Observed Seismic Behavior of Buildings in Northern Pakistan during the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake , 2010 .

[23]  Sebastien Leprince,et al.  The 2005, Mw 7.6 Kashmir earthquake: Sub-pixel correlation of ASTER images and seismic waveforms analysis , 2006 .

[24]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Seismic Damage Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Structures After The Abruzzo 2009 Earthquake: The Case Study of the Historical Centers of L'Aquila and Castelvecchio Subequo , 2013 .

[25]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the September 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake , 2010 .

[26]  Jayanta Guin,et al.  Extreme Losses from Natural Disasters-Earthquakes , Tropical Cyclones and Extratropical Cyclones , 2001 .

[27]  Jitendra Bothara,et al.  General observations of building behaviour during the 8th October 2005 Pakistan earthquake , 2008 .

[28]  Cal F. Bearman Post-Earthquake Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Frames , 2012 .

[29]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Structures Subjected to Seismic Action , 2007 .

[30]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering , 2004 .

[31]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (ACI 318-11) AND COMMENTARY" , 2011 .