The internal flow of diesel fuel injector nozzles: A review

Abstract Diesel fuel injector nozzles have a significant effect on the quality of spray and charge preparation. However, the mechanism and degree of this effect is unclear. The complexity of the internal nozzle flow has hindered the study of the fuel injection process. Diesel fuel injector nozzle flows are highly turbulent and usually two-phase. Several experiments have shown the presence of cavitation in the nozzles to be a dominating effect. Recent experimental work has revealed new qualitative details about the cavitation in fuel injector nozzles. The cavity tends to be smooth near the inlet, transitioning to a more ruffled appearance downstream. These flows are also strongly asymmetric in realistic geometries. Additionally, photographs have shown string cavitation inside the sac volume extending into the nozzles. The strings appear to be a form of stratified two-phase flow, like the cavities near the inlet corner. Like the cavities, the strings break down into bubbly flow near the exit of the nozzle. Future experiments in this field should address the exact nature of the two-phase flow at the exit. In spite of these difficulties, useful models for the flow in fuel injector nozzles have been developed. Analytical models work very well for the steady state behaviour of axisymmetric nozzles. Multi-dimensional models have proved to be useful for more general geometries and attempt to predict transient behaviour. There is currently no consensus on the basic physics behind the multi-dimensional models. Despite this controversy, there are several models available that have succeeded in predicting gross cavitation behaviour. The implications of the recent experimental investigations are that future cavitation models should include the ability to simulate more than one kind of cavitation. Typically, a model assumes that the cavitation is either a smooth cavity or a bubbly mixture. In general, the ideal cavitation model must capture either kind of behaviour.

[1]  Stephen D. Heister,et al.  Two-phase modeling of cavitated flows , 1995 .

[2]  D. Schmidt,et al.  DETECTION OF CAVITATION IN FUEL INJECTOR NOZZLES , 2022 .

[3]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  A Photographic Study of Flash-Boiling Atomization , 1990 .

[4]  Luis P. Bernal,et al.  Continuous- and dispersed-phase structure of dense nonevaporating pressure-atomized sprays , 1992 .

[5]  R. Reitz Atomization and other breakup regimes of a liquid jet , 1978 .

[6]  Edward D. Klomp VALVE-COVERED-ORIFICE (VCO) FUEL INJECTION NOZZLE DELIVERY ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[7]  E. Markland,et al.  Discharge Coefficients for Incompressible Non-Cavitating Flow through Long Orifices , 1965 .

[8]  Marco Badami,et al.  Cavitation in real-size, multi-hole diesel injector nozzles , 2000 .

[9]  L. Rayleigh VIII. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity , 1917 .

[10]  David P. Schmidt,et al.  ANALYTICAL PREDICTION OF THE EXIT FLOW OF CAVITATING ORIFICES , 1997 .

[11]  Manolis Gavaises,et al.  Effect of Fuel Injection Processes on the Structure of Diesel Sprays , 1997 .

[12]  R. Reitz,et al.  Mechanism of atomization of a liquid jet , 1982 .

[13]  Hiroyuki Hiroyasu,et al.  SPRAY BREAKUP MECHANISM FROM THE HOLE-TYPE NOZZLE AND ITS APPLICATIONS , 2000 .

[14]  Arthur H. Lefebvre,et al.  GEOMETRIC EFFECTS ON SPRAY CONE ANGLE FOR PLAIN-ORIFICE ATOMIZERS , 1991 .

[15]  S. P. Hutton,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Two-Dimensional Fixed-Type Cavities , 1975 .

[16]  Christopher J. Rutland,et al.  A Numerical Study of Cavitating Flow Through Various Nozzle Shapes , 1997 .

[17]  F. Ruiz Gomez Experimental and theoretical analysis of high-speed atomization, and its application to diesel-fuel injection , 1987 .

[18]  M. J. McCarthy,et al.  Review of stability of liquid jets and the influence of nozzle design , 1974 .

[19]  Stephen D. Heister,et al.  CAVITATING INJECTOR FLOWS: VALIDATION OF NUMERICAL MODELS AND SIMULATIONS OF PRESSURE ATOMIZERS , 1999 .

[20]  Ömer L. Gülder,et al.  VIEWS ON THE STRUCTURE OF TRANSIENT DIESEL SPRAYS , 2000 .

[21]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries , 1981 .

[22]  Thomas W. Ryan,et al.  Effects of Different Injector Hole Shapes on Diesel Sprays , 1992 .

[23]  Celia Soteriou,et al.  Direct Injection Diesel Sprays and the Effect of Cavitation and Hydraulic Flip on Atomization , 1995 .

[24]  R. Reitz,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Injector Nozzle Geometry on Diesel Sprays , 1999 .

[25]  F. V. Bracco,et al.  Measurements of the Spray Angle of Atomizing Jets , 1983 .

[26]  J. Paul Tullis,et al.  Cavitation Scale Effects for Valves , 1973 .

[27]  W. Ranz,et al.  Some experiments on orifice sprays , 1958 .

[28]  Takao Karasawa,et al.  EFFECT OF NOZZLE CONFIGURATION ON THE ATOMIZATION OF A STEADY SPRAY , 1991 .

[29]  Christopher J. Rutland,et al.  A FULLY COMPRESSIBLE, TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODEL OF SMALL, HIGH-SPEED, CAVITATING NOZZLES , 1999 .

[30]  Keiya Nishida,et al.  Characteristics of the Internal Flow in a Diesel Injection Nozzle , 2023, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems.

[31]  Stephen D. Heister,et al.  MODELING CAVITATING FLOWS IN DIESEL INJECTORS , 1996 .

[32]  G. Wallis One Dimensional Two-Phase Flow , 1969 .

[33]  L. N. Randall Rocket Applications of the Cavitating Venturi , 1952 .

[34]  H. Kato,et al.  A consideration of thermal effect on cavitation bubble growth , 1994 .

[35]  W. H. Nurick,et al.  Orifice Cavitation and Its Effect on Spray Mixing , 1976 .

[36]  W. Bergwerk,et al.  Flow Pattern in Diesel Nozzle Spray Holes , 1959 .

[37]  M. Plesset The Dynamics of Cavitation Bubbles , 1949 .

[38]  J. C. Kent,et al.  Nozzle Exit Flow Characteristics for Square-edged and Rounded Inlet Geometries , 1983 .