Importance weights in service engineering: A commentary on research opportunities

Multi-criteria decision making methods are often used in situations that involve comparing the performance of multiple service designs. These methods construct an overall performance measure comprising a weighted function of different, possibly conflicting, objectives. The weights are usually estimates of the 'importance' of the corresponding objective to performance. Little is known about what contributes to variations in assigned importance weights in service process decision-making. In this paper, we seek to motivate research addressing: What influences importance weights assigned to service process variables? The paper uses managerial and consumer decision- making literature to propose some factors that influence importance weights, and will suggest opportunities for further research

[1]  H. Barksdale,et al.  Marketers’ Attitudes toward the Marketing Concept , 1971 .

[2]  Charles P. Schmidt,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Additive Multiattribute Value Models , 1988, Oper. Res..

[3]  M. Shelly,et al.  HUMAN JUDGMENTS AND OPTIMALITY.. , 1966 .

[4]  W. Wedley,et al.  Ambiguous Criteria Weights in AHP: Consequences and Solutions* , 1989 .

[5]  Ference Marton,et al.  The Phenomenography of the ´Mole Concept´ in Chemistry , 1988 .

[6]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Mental models as a practical tool in the engineer's toolbox , 2005 .

[7]  Michael Pidd,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  I. Levin,et al.  Confidence in judgments based on incomplete information: An investigation using both hypothetical and real gambles , 1988 .

[9]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions , 1979, Oper. Res..

[10]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  Framing the problem and making decisions: the facts are not enough , 1989 .

[11]  P. Frensch,et al.  Complex problem solving : the European perspective , 1995 .

[12]  Sema Barlas,et al.  When choices give in to temptations: Explaining the disagreement among importance measures , 2003 .

[13]  J. Baron,et al.  Investigating the effect of stimulus range on attribute weight. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Katrin Borcherding,et al.  Biases in multiattribute weight elicitation , 1995 .

[15]  Jan Barnsley,et al.  Competing values of emergency department performance: balancing multiple stakeholder perspectives. , 2004, Health services research.

[16]  E. Higgins.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[17]  Pieter Koele,et al.  A Comparison of Different Methods for the Elicitation of Attribute Weights: Structural Modeling, Process Tracing, and Self-Reports , 1995 .

[18]  W. Goldstein.  Judgments of relative importance in decision making: Global vs local interpretations of subjective weight , 1990 .

[19]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments , 1996 .

[20]  Robert T. Eckenrode,et al.  Weighting Multiple Criteria , 1965 .

[21]  Liang-Hsuan Chen.  Designing robust products with multiple quality characteristics , 1997, Comput. Oper. Res..

[22]  C. C. Waid,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models , 1982 .

[23]  M. Brumby,et al.  Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students , 1984 .

[24]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation , 2008 .

[25]  G. Bower,et al.  Mood effects on person-perception judgments. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Rita Di Mascio,et al.  A method to evaluate service delivery process quality , 2007 .

[27]  I. Levin,et al.  Estimating Price-Quality Tradeoffs Using Comparative Judgments , 1984 .

[28]  Thomas R. Stewart,et al.  A comparison of seven methods for obtaining subjective descriptions of judgmental policy , 1975 .

[29]  Kenneth J. Dunegan.  Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full. , 1993 .

[30]  V. Kumar,et al.  Attribute order and product familiarity effects in decision tasks using conjoint analysis , 1991 .

[31]  Peretz Shoval,et al.  Models for computer system evaluation and selection , 1987, Inf. Manag..

[32]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[33]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal relatedness and importance of story events , 1985 .

[34]  Philippe Delquié,et al.  Inconsistent trade-offs between attributes: new evidence in preference assessment biases , 1993 .

[35]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Concepts of Relative Importance in Recent Scientific Literature , 1989 .

[36]  E. Choo,et al.  Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision making , 1999 .

[37]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice: , 1999 .

[38]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions , 1998 .

[39]  I. Levin,et al.  How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product , 1988 .

[40]  J. Pligt,et al.  Influencing risk-preference in decision-making: The effects of framing and salience , 1995 .

[41]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  On variation in conceptions of `price' in economics , 2002 .

[42]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  The threat of weighting biases in environmental decision analysis , 2008 .

[43]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[44]  Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.  An interactive fuzzy multi-objective optimization method for engineering design , 2006, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[45]  José A. Sepúlveda,et al.  Multi-objective simulation optimization for a cancer treatment center , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[46]  J. H. Myers,et al.  Semantic Confusion in Attitude Research: Salience Vs. Importance Vs. Determinance , 1977 .

[47]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  A Pyramid of Decision Approaches , 1993 .

[48]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment , 1988 .

[49]  T. Marteau,et al.  Framing of information: its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. , 1989, The British journal of social psychology.

[50]  H. Gray,et al.  On being sad and mistaken: mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  P. C. Austin,et al.  Dynamic matrix control of a paper machine benchmark problem , 1995 .

[52]  Ehsan S. Soofi,et al.  A Framework for Measuring the Importance of Variables with Applications to Management Research and Decision Models , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[53]  John R. Doyle,et al.  A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best , 2001 .

[54]  Eric W.T. Ngai,et al.  Design and development of a fuzzy expert system for hotel selection , 2003 .

[55]  Wai-Fah Chen,et al.  Multiobjective and multilevel optimization for steel frames , 1999 .

[56]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The strategy map: guide to aligning intangible assets , 2004 .

[57]  Manuel D. Rossetti,et al.  Multi-objective analysis of hospital delivery systems , 2001 .

[58]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Attribute Importance Weights Modification in Assessing a Brand's Competitive Potential , 1995 .

[59]  On Amir,et al.  Choice Construction versus Preference Construction: The Instability of Preferences Learned in Context , 2007 .

[60]  R. Sternberg.  Implicit theories of intelligence. creativity, and wisdom , 1985 .

[61]  R. C. Sinclair,et al.  Mood, categorization breadth, and performance appraisal: The effects of order of information acquisition and affective state on halo, accuracy, information retrieval, and evaluations , 1988 .

[62]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information , 1985 .

[63]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Complexity metrics for Workflow nets , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..