Generation of consistent skin model shape based on FEA method

Controlling product geometric quality is an important issue, because real parts deviate from their nominal value (e.g., in form, orientation, and position error of features, size of part, etc.). To analyze the influence of these deviations on final product, one solution is to consider the nonnominal Skin Model Shape to simulate assembly, manufacturing, or metrology. The modeling of nonnominal parts is still in its initial phases. First, methods of generating a single feature with deviations are reviewed and classified. With the combination of the single nonideal features to obtain the complete nonideal model of the part, geometrical issues appear, such as gaps and self-intersections. These can be influenced by acute and obtuse angles and the ratio between mesh size and deviation value. From an analysis of these issues, two deviation combination methods are proposed to preserve the manufacturing deviation of features and consistency of the model. These methods are qualified as local and global methods. The local method is based on the iterative calculation of mesh regularization. The global method is based on finite element analysis, with manufacturing deviations added to the nominal model by the penalty function approach. The effectiveness and efficiency of both kinds of method are compared on a trial geometry. The global method is preferred as it needs no iterative calculation, no stop criteria and gives better results. Finally, the proposed method is validated on a more complex mechanical part: a cutter body.

[1]  M. Fortin,et al.  Anisotropic mesh adaptation: towards user‐independent, mesh‐independent and solver‐independent CFD. Part II. Structured grids , 2002 .

[2]  A. Clément,et al.  A dimensioning and tolerancing assistance model for CAD/CAM systems , 1994 .

[3]  Chunxia Xiao,et al.  Shape-controllable geometry completion for point cloud models , 2016, The Visual Computer.

[4]  David V. Hutton,et al.  Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis , 2003 .

[5]  Alex Ballu,et al.  A Model for a Coherent and Complete Tolerancing Process , 2007 .

[6]  Darek Ceglarek,et al.  Physics-driven shape variation modelling at early design stage , 2016 .

[7]  Yin-Lin Shen,et al.  Enhanced virtual machining for sculptured surfaces by integrating machine tool error models into NC machining simulation , 2004 .

[8]  Allan D. Spence,et al.  Integrated solid modeller based solutions for machining , 2000, Comput. Aided Des..

[9]  K. D. Summerhays,et al.  Methods for evaluation of systematic geometric deviations in machined parts and their relationships to process variables , 1999 .

[10]  F. Blom Considerations on the spring analogy , 2000 .

[11]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Comparative Study on Tolerance Analysis Approaches , 2014 .

[12]  Behrooz Arezoo,et al.  Virtual machining considering dimensional, geometrical and tool deflection errors in three-axis CNC milling machines , 2014 .

[13]  Joseph K. Davidson,et al.  A New Mathematical Model for Geometric Tolerances as Applied to Round Faces , 2002 .

[14]  Pasquale Franciosa,et al.  Simulation of variational compliant assemblies with shape errors based on morphing mesh approach , 2011 .

[15]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[16]  Nabil Anwer,et al.  The skin model, a comprehensive geometric model for engineering design , 2013 .

[17]  Chau-Lyan Chang,et al.  Mesh deformation based on fully stressed design: the method and 2‐D examples , 2007 .

[18]  Serge Samper,et al.  Modal Expression of Form Defects , 2007 .

[19]  Nicholas J. Hills,et al.  A moving mesh algorithm for aero‐thermo‐mechanical modelling in turbomachinery , 2012 .

[20]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Toward a Theory of Geometric Tolerancing , 1983 .

[21]  Stephan Husung,et al.  Use of Vectorial Tolerances for Direct Representation and Analysis in CAD-systems☆ , 2015 .

[22]  Zhenyu Kong,et al.  Simulation and integration of geometric and rigid body kinematics errors for assembly variation analysis , 2008 .

[23]  J. Molinari,et al.  From infinitesimal to full contact between rough surfaces: Evolution of the contact area , 2014, 1401.3800.

[24]  Alex Ballu,et al.  Univocal expression of functional and geometrical tolerances for design, manufacturing and inspection , 1996 .

[25]  Kuo-Young Cheng,et al.  A Sharpness-Dependent Filter for Recovering Sharp Features in Repaired 3D Mesh Models , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[26]  Polini Wilma,et al.  Manufacturing Signature for Tolerance Analysis , 2015 .

[27]  Berend Denkena,et al.  Virtual process systems for part machining operations , 2014 .

[28]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Interactive multi-resolution modeling on arbitrary meshes , 1998, SIGGRAPH.

[29]  Denis Teissandier,et al.  A computer aided tolerancing model: proportioned assembly clearance volume , 1999, Comput. Aided Des..

[30]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Skin Model Shapes: A new paradigm shift for geometric variations modelling in mechanical engineering , 2014, Comput. Aided Des..

[31]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Feature sensitive mesh segmentation with mean shift , 2005, International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications 2005 (SMI' 05).

[32]  Shuangshuang Jin,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for vertex normal computation , 2005, The Visual Computer.

[33]  Tao Ju,et al.  Fixing Geometric Errors on Polygonal Models: A Survey , 2009, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[34]  M. Gadala,et al.  Simulation of the orthogonal metal cutting process using an arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian finite-element method , 2000 .

[35]  K. To̸nder,et al.  Simulation of 3-D random rough surface by 2-D digital filter and fourier analysis , 1992 .

[36]  Wang Hu,et al.  Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by adaptive response surface based on intelligent sampling method , 2008 .

[37]  Gaurav Ameta,et al.  Comparison of Spatial Math Models for Tolerance Analysis: Tolerance-Maps, Deviation Domain, and TTRS , 2011, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[38]  Alain Desrochers,et al.  Theory and Practice of 3-D Tolerancing for Assembly , 1991 .

[39]  J. Wyant,et al.  Basic Wavefront Aberration Theory for Optical Metrology , 1992 .

[40]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Using Morphing Techniques in Early Variation Analysis , 2014, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[41]  Yutaka Ohtake,et al.  Mesh regularization and adaptive smoothing , 2001, Comput. Aided Des..

[42]  Paul Steinmann,et al.  A staggered approach to shape and topology optimization using the traction method and an evolutionary-type advancing front algorithm , 2015 .

[43]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Discrete shape modeling for skin model representation , 2013 .

[44]  Nabil Anwer,et al.  A Discrete Geometry Framework for Geometrical Product Specifications , 2011 .

[45]  Halidou Niandou,et al.  Virtual Metrology Laboratory for e-Learning , 2016 .

[46]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Formal Language for GeoSpelling , 2015, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[47]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Skin Model Shapes: Offering New Potentials for Modelling Product Shape Variability , 2015 .

[48]  Sung-Lim Ko,et al.  Development of simulation system for machining process using enhanced Z map model , 2002 .

[49]  X. Yan,et al.  Toward an Automatic Generation of Part Models with Form Error , 2016 .

[50]  C. R. Ethier,et al.  A semi-torsional spring analogy model for updating unstructured meshes in 3D moving domains , 2005 .

[51]  Li Bo,et al.  Geometrical Simulation of Multiscale Toleranced Surface With Consideration of the Tolerancing Principle , 2015 .

[52]  Ming C. Leu,et al.  The sweep-envelope differential equation algorithm and its application to NC machining verification , 1997, Comput. Aided Des..

[53]  Denis Teissandier,et al.  Operations on polytopes: application to tolerance analysis , 2011, ArXiv.

[54]  Hua Chen,et al.  A comprehensive study of three dimensional tolerance analysis methods , 2014, Comput. Aided Des..

[55]  Min Hu,et al.  Simulation and analysis of assembly processes considering compliant, non-ideal parts and tooling variations , 2001 .