When the birds go unheard: highway noise disrupts information transfer between bird species

Highway infrastructure and accompanying vehicle noise is associated with decreased wildlife populations in adjacent habitats. Noise masking of animal communication is an oft-cited potential mechanism underlying species loss in sound-polluted habitats. This study documents the disruption of between-species information transfer by anthropogenic noise. Titmice and chickadees broadcast specific calls to alert kin of predator threats, and sympatric vertebrates eavesdrop on these alarm calls to avoid predators. We tested if tufted titmouse alarm call eavesdropping by northern cardinals is disrupted by road noise. We broadcast recorded alarm calls to cardinals in natural areas near and far from highways. Cardinals reliably produced predator avoidance responses in quiet trials, but all birds in noisy areas failed to respond, demonstrating that highway noise is loud enough to disrupt this type of survival-related information via masking or cognitive distraction. Birds in family Paridae are abundant, highly social and vocal residents of woodlands across the Holarctic whose alarm calls are used by many species to mediate predation risks. Our work suggests that communication network disruption is likely to be widespread, and could help explain the pattern of reduced biodiversity near roadways.

[1]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Methods : A Primer , 1986 .

[2]  Clinton D. Francis,et al.  A Framework for Understanding Noise Impacts on Wildlife: An Urgent Conservation Priority , 2013 .

[3]  J. Barber,et al.  A phantom road experiment reveals traffic noise is an invisible source of habitat degradation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  W. Cresswell Non‐lethal effects of predation in birds , 2008 .

[5]  Kevin R Crooks,et al.  The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Kathryn E. Sieving,et al.  Too risky to settle: avian community structure changes in response to perceived predation risk on adults and offspring , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[8]  R. Forman,et al.  ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[9]  M. Ficken Acoustic characteristics of alarm calls associated with predation risk in chickadees , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions , 2010 .

[11]  Erick Greene,et al.  Nuthatches eavesdrop on variations in heterospecific chickadee mobbing alarm calls , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  J. Barber,et al.  An experimental investigation into the effects of traffic noise on distributions of birds: avoiding the phantom road , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  C. Mary,et al.  Heterospecific information about predation risk influences exploratory behavior , 2012 .

[14]  Michael L. Avery,et al.  The versatility of graded acoustic measures in classification of predation threats by the tufted titmouse Baeolophus bicolor: exploring a mixed framework for threat communication , 2010 .

[15]  R. D. Magrath,et al.  Eavesdropping on the neighbours: fledglings learn to respond to heterospecific alarm calls , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Increased amplitude and duration of acoustic stimuli enhance distraction , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  G. Langham,et al.  Why pishing works: Titmouse (Paridae) scolds elicit a generalized response in bird communities , 2006 .

[18]  Hanna Benoni,et al.  Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[19]  Sarah E. Reed,et al.  A GIS tool for modeling anthropogenic noise propagation in natural ecosystems , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..