Comparative effectiveness and risk of preterm birth of local treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage IA1 cervical cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

[1]  P. Sasieni,et al.  The effects of the national HPV vaccination programme in England, UK, on cervical cancer and grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia incidence: a register-based observational study , 2021, The Lancet.

[2]  M. Arbyn,et al.  The impact of HPV vaccination beyond cancer prevention: effect on pregnancy outcomes , 2021, Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics.

[3]  M. Schiffman,et al.  Erratum: 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. , 2021, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[4]  T. Enomoto,et al.  Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology , 2021, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[5]  P. Sparén,et al.  HPV Vaccination and the Risk of Invasive Cervical Cancer. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Andrea Cipriani,et al.  The Kilim plot: A tool for visualizing network meta‐analysis results for multiple outcomes , 2020, Research synthesis methods.

[7]  M. Schiffman,et al.  2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors , 2020, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[8]  G. Salanti,et al.  Incidence and mortality from cervical cancer and other malignancies after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature , 2020, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[10]  Natalie S Blencowe,et al.  RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2019, BMJ.

[11]  H. Naci,et al.  Comparative fertility and pregnancy outcomes after local treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage 1a1 cervical cancer: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis from the CIRCLE group , 2019, BMJ Open.

[12]  H. Naci,et al.  Comparative efficacy and complication rates after local treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage 1a1 cervical cancer: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis from the CIRCLE Group , 2019, BMJ Open.

[13]  S. McDonald,et al.  Interventions to Try to Prevent Preterm Birth in Women With a History of Conization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. , 2019, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[14]  S. Leeson,et al.  Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  V. Canzonieri,et al.  Trend of decreasing length of cervical cone excision during the last 20 years. , 2017, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[16]  Dimitris Mavridis,et al.  Combining randomized and non‐randomized evidence in network meta‐analysis , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  J. Bakkum-Gamez,et al.  Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[18]  J. Nicholson,et al.  The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk , 2017, Microbiome.

[19]  D. MacIntyre,et al.  Preterm Birth Prevention Post-Conization: A Model of Cervical Length Screening with Targeted Cerclage , 2016, PloS one.

[20]  J. Marchesi,et al.  The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: what do we know and where are we going next? , 2016, Microbiome.

[21]  M. Hernán,et al.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[22]  Marc Arbyn,et al.  Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[23]  H. Schünemann,et al.  Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[24]  H. Kitchener,et al.  Risk of preterm birth following surgical treatment for cervical disease: executive summary of a recent symposium , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[25]  Gerta Rücker,et al.  Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods , 2015, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[26]  Gerta Rücker,et al.  Network Meta-Analysis using Frequentist Methods , 2015 .

[27]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[28]  P. Bennett,et al.  Proportion of cervical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[29]  P. Martin-Hirsch,et al.  Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  Anna Chaimani,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  R. Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Meta‐analysis of the efficacy of cold coagulation as a treatment method for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[32]  J. Gondry,et al.  Long term outcomes for women treated for cervical precancer , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  P. Sparén,et al.  Effect of ageing on cervical or vaginal cancer in Swedish women previously treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study of long term incidence and mortality , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  H. Dickinson,et al.  Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[35]  Naveena Singh,et al.  Risk of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women attending colposcopy in England: retrospective-prospective cohort study , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  I. White,et al.  Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  Dan Jackson,et al.  Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression‡ , 2012, Research synthesis methods.

[38]  Simon G Thompson,et al.  Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[39]  S Dias,et al.  Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[40]  W. Prendiville,et al.  Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[41]  P. Hillemanns,et al.  Cost of screening and treatment of cervical dyskaryosis in Germany. , 2008, European journal of gynaecological oncology.

[42]  P. Martin-Hirsch,et al.  Commentary: Have we dismissed ablative treatment too soon in colposcopy practice? , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[43]  M Arbyn,et al.  Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2006, The Lancet.

[44]  P. Babb,et al.  Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. , 1999, BMJ.

[45]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.