Updating of an internal model without proprioception: a deafferentation study

This study sought to determine whether intact proprioception is required to adapt to a novel kinematic environment. We compared adaptation with a rotated visual feedback between a deafferented patient and healthy participants. They performed reaching movements towards visible targets while vision of the cursor was rotated by 30° with respect to hand position. The patient adapted at the same rate and to the same extent as the controls when exposed to the rotated visual feedback. She also presented large aftereffects following removal of the perturbation. This suggests that proprioception is not an absolute requirement to update a kinematic internal model. Adaptation was likely mediated by a comparison between the sensory consequences of a movement as predicted by a forward model and the visual feedback from that movement.

[1]  J. Vercher,et al.  Internally driven control of reaching movements: A study on a proprioceptively deafferented subject , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[2]  G. M. Redding,et al.  Strategie Calibration and Spatial Alignment: A Model From Prism Adaptation , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  E. Taub,et al.  Use of Sensory Recombination and Somatosensory Deafferentation Techniques in the Investigation of Sensory-Motor Integration , 1974, Perception.

[4]  Gordon M. Redding,et al.  Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[5]  Matthew Heath,et al.  The control of goal-directed limb movements: Correcting errors in the trajectory , 1999 .

[6]  J. Gordon,et al.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errors. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Preserved prism adaptation in bilateral optic ataxia: strategic versus adaptive reaction to prisms , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Y. Lamarre,et al.  Rapid elbow flexion in the absence of proprioceptive and cutaneous feedback. , 1987, Human neurobiology.

[9]  C. Bard,et al.  Contribution of proprioception for calibrating and updating the motor space. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[10]  N Teasdale,et al.  Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects , 1992, Neurology.

[11]  J Blouin,et al.  Adaptation in visuomanual tracking depends on intact proprioception. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  Gavin P. Lawrence,et al.  Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[13]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Miall,et al.  The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Task-specific internal models for kinematic transformations. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.