A portmanteau experiment on the relevance of individual decision anomalies for households

[1]  B. Kebede,et al.  Intra-Household Efficiency: An Experimental Study from Ethiopia , 2011 .

[2]  André de Palma,et al.  Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: evidence on the dynamics of power balance , 2011 .

[3]  M. Abdellaoui,et al.  Individual vs. Collective Behavior: An Experimental Investigation of Risk and Time Preferences in Couples , 2010 .

[4]  Astrid Hopfensitz,et al.  Do Spouses Cooperate? And If Not: Why? , 2009 .

[5]  Nava Ashraf,et al.  Spousal Control and Intra-household Decision Making: An Experimental Study in the Philippines , 2009 .

[6]  M. Sutter,et al.  Household Decision Making and the Influence of Spouses' Income, Education, and Communist Party Membership: A Field Experiment in Rural China , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  André de Palma,et al.  Individual and Couple Decision Behavior under Risk:The Power of Ultimate Control , 2008 .

[8]  A. Munro,et al.  Taking it in Turn: An Experimental Test of Theories of the Household , 2008 .

[9]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  B. Kebede,et al.  What's Love Got to Do with It? An Experimental Test of Household Models in East Uganda , 2006 .

[11]  M. Kocher,et al.  The Decision Maker Matters: Individual Versus Group Behaviour in Experimental Beauty-Contest Games , 2005 .

[12]  Alistair Munro,et al.  An Experiment on Risky Choice Amongst Households , 2005 .

[13]  J. List.  Does market experience eliminate market anomalies , 2003 .

[14]  John A. List,et al.  Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The "More Is Less" Phenomenon , 2002 .

[15]  S. Shafir,et al.  Context-dependent violations of rational choice in honeybees (Apis mellifera) and gray jays (Perisoreus canadensis) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  J. Doyle,et al.  The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect: Buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in‐store purchases , 1999 .

[17]  D. Messick.  Alternative logics for decision making in social settings , 1999 .

[18]  John Bone,et al.  Are Groups More (or Less) Consistent Than Individuals? , 1999 .

[19]  Christopher K. Hsee.  Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options , 1998 .

[20]  I. Bateman,et al.  A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 1997 .

[21]  G. C. Morrison,et al.  Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: some evidence of an endowment effect , 1997 .

[22]  R. Thaler,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle , 1993 .

[23]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[24]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  Models of Cooperative Group Decision-Making and Relative Influence: An Experimental Investigation of Family Purchase Decisions , 1987 .

[25]  John Meurig Thomas,et al.  Close relationships , 1985, Nature.

[26]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[27]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[29]  T. Morton.  Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: A comparison of spouses and strangers. , 1978 .