An exploratory study of strategic performance measurement systems

This exploratory study aims at identifying the main characteristics of strategic performance measurement systems (SPMS) that influence SPMS outcomes, which, in turn, impact firm performance. Using data from 1,990 companies in a wide range of industries, we employed path analysis and stepwise regression to test the model. We found empirical support for the model, in that SPMS have a significant effect on human resource practices and business results. The degree of BSC adoption, the impact of SPMS on human resources, the purposes for which the SPMS were designed, and the use of nonfinancial performance measures were found to have the most effect on the impact of the SPMS on business results.

[1]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Keys to Executive Information Systems Success , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  J. Manzoni,et al.  THE BALANCED SCORECARD AND TABLEAU DE BORD: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON TRANSLATING STRATEGY INTO ACTION , 2007 .

[3]  R. Dorf,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action , 1997, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Lokman Mia,et al.  The usefulness of management accounting systems, functional differentiation and managerial effectiveness , 1994 .

[5]  C. Narasimhan,et al.  Understanding customer level profitability implications of satisfaction programs , 2008 .

[6]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[7]  G. Kominis,et al.  The expectancy–valence theory revisited: Developing an extended model of managerial motivation , 2007 .

[8]  Andy Neely,et al.  Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems , 2000 .

[9]  R. Chenhall.  Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study , 2005 .

[10]  L. White,et al.  Budgeting, Performance Evaluation, and Compensation: A Performance Management Model , 2006 .

[11]  Kelvin F. Cross,et al.  Measure Up!: Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement , 1991 .

[12]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II , 2001 .

[13]  Alfred J. Nanni,et al.  The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World-Class Competition , 1990 .

[14]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy, and Performance , 2001 .

[15]  R. Banker,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan that Includes Nonfinancial Performance Measures , 2000 .

[16]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  S. Widener,et al.  Managing Value Creation within the Firm: An Examination of Multiple Performance Measures , 2004 .

[18]  Mary A. Malina,et al.  Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard , 2001 .

[19]  Laurie L. Burney,et al.  Strategic Performance Measurement Systems, Job‐Relevant Information, and Managerial Behavioral Responses—Role Stress and Performance , 2007 .

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation* , 1954 .

[21]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design: Should process based approaches be adopted? , 1996 .

[22]  Ananth Srinivasan,et al.  Alternative Measures of Systems Effectiveness: Associations and Implications , 1985, MIS Q..

[23]  D. Larcker,et al.  Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction , 1998 .

[24]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[25]  Denise M. English,et al.  Levers of Control , 1996 .

[26]  Richard A. Riley,et al.  Using Nonfinancial Information to Predict Financial Performance: The Case of the U.S. Airline Industry , 1999 .

[27]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms , 2003 .

[28]  J. Mouritsen.  Beyond accounting change: Design and mobilisation of management control systems , 2005 .

[29]  Gary W. Loveman,et al.  Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work , 1994 .

[30]  D. Larcker,et al.  Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective , 2001 .

[31]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide , 1997 .

[32]  Mary A. Malina,et al.  Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard , 2001 .

[33]  D. Larcker,et al.  Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications , 1998 .

[34]  Stefan Tangen.  Analysing the requirements of performance measurement systems , 2005 .

[35]  Steven E. Salterio,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: The Effects of Assurance and Process Accountability on Managerial Judgment , 2004 .

[36]  Karl-Erik Sveiby.  The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[37]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[38]  Kim Langfield-Smith,et al.  Factors Influencing the Role of Management Accounting in the Development of Performance Measures within Organizational Change Programs , 1998 .

[39]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[40]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[41]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .