Despite a significant number of publications and the increasing use of numerical simulation, there is still a debate about the optimum gate design and packing conditions in the molding industry. Shrinkage uniformity for unfilled polymers is dominated by the time dependent pressure distribution in the cavity and the resulting volumetric shrinkage; gate freeze-off is obviously important and difficult to predict; and pressure gradients during the packing phase, depend on process and design parameters and are also affected by the mold elasticity. Molding trials have been conducted on an instrumented mold (fan gated rectangular slab, 2 mm thick) under a variety of processing conditions and with different gate thicknesses using HDPE (Solvay Eltex A1050). Pressure decay during the molding cycle at different locations along the flow path have been correlated with sample thickness distribution. Overpacking at moderate packing pressure is shown to be a direct consequence of mold elasticity and to be related to both filling flow rate and gate thickness. The decay to a finite residual pressure can be computed by coupling the mold elasticity with the PVT behavior of the polymer. The results highlight the importance of gate design and processing parameters on the dimensional accuracy of the part and low internal stress level. When dealing with thick gates, packing pressure profiling appears to be the best way to avoid gate area overpacking. Mold elastic deformation can play a significant role in the cavity pressure-time history, even for a seemingly stiff mold construction.
[1]
S. Piccarolo,et al.
On the packing–holding flow in the injection molding of thermoplastic polymers
,
1988
.
[2]
J. E. Sunderland,et al.
Thermal contact resistance in injection molding
,
1990
.
[3]
Tai‐Shung Chung.
AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE FLUID MOTION AND PRESSURE BUILD-UP IN A NON-ISOTHERMAL INJECTION MOLD PACKING STAGE
,
1988
.
[4]
Gapwise density distributions in injection-molded poly(methylmethacrylate)
,
1993
.
[5]
C. A. Hieber,et al.
A unified simulation of the filling and postfilling stages in injection molding. Part I: Formulation
,
1991
.
[6]
Avraam Isayev,et al.
Injection and Compression Molding Fundamentals
,
1987
.
[7]
A. Flaman.
Buildup and relaxation of molecular orientation in injection molding. Part I: Formulation
,
1993
.
[8]
J. Verdu,et al.
Skin‐core structure–fatigue behavior relationships for injection‐molded parts of polypropylene. I. Influence of molecular weight and injection conditions on the morphology
,
1987
.