Sex differences in lateralization revealed in the posterior language areas.

It has been hypothesized that language functions are more strongly lateralized to the left hemisphere in males than in females. Previous anatomical data and patient studies have suggested that the posterior language areas should exhibit sex differences. However, neuroimaging studies to date have only provided support for differences in the anterior language areas. To look for differences in the posterior language areas, functional magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained while male and female subjects listened attentively to a story read aloud and to the same story replayed in reverse. Comparing activation in the superior and the middle temporal gyri during a story to activation during reverse replay of the story showed lateralization to the left in males but not in females. There was no lateralization in either sex when comparing activation during random fragmentation of the story to reverse replay. In the angular and the supramarginal gyri, however, activation was lateralized to the left hemisphere in both sexes, unlike the sex-dependent activation of the posterior temporal lobes. We infer that females use the posterior temporal lobes more bilaterally during linguistic processing of global structures in a narrative than males do.

[1]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[2]  Douglas W. Jones,et al.  Gender differences in the normal lateralization of the supratemporal cortex: MRI surface-rendering morphometry of Heschl's gyrus and the planum temporale. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  S. F. Witelson Hand and sex differences in the isthmus and genu of the human corpus callosum. A postmortem morphological study. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  R W Cox,et al.  Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes. Evidence from functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  L. Katz,et al.  Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  J. Inglis,et al.  Sex differences in the effects of unilateral brain damage on intelligence. , 1981, Science.

[8]  J. Mehler,et al.  Neuroscience: Right on in sign language , 1998, Nature.

[9]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  The neurobiology of sign language and its implications for the neural basis of language , 1996, Nature.

[10]  A. Syrota,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Speech , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  J J Jaeger,et al.  Sex differences in brain regions activated by grammatical and reading tasks , 1998, Neuroreport.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Positron Emission Tomographic Studies of the Processing of Singe Words , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Antonia Chandrasegaran,et al.  Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension , 1999 .

[14]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Y. Huang,et al.  Sex but no hand difference in the isthmus of the corpus callosum , 1992, Neurology.

[16]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[17]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[18]  D. Kimura Sex and cognition , 1999 .

[19]  Daphne Bavelier,et al.  Brain and Language a Perspective from Sign Language , 1998, Neuron.

[20]  G Schlaug,et al.  Corpus callosum and brain volume in women and men , 1995, Neuroreport.

[21]  J. Staiger,et al.  Using High-resolution , 2022 .

[22]  K O Lim,et al.  Quantitative assessment of improved homogeneity using higher‐order shims for spectroscopic imaging of the brain , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  K Kawano,et al.  Sequential hemodynamic activation of motor areas and the draining veins during finger movements revealed by cross‐correlation between signals from fMRI , 1998, Neuroreport.

[24]  Patrice Y. Simard,et al.  Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  J. Mcglone,et al.  Sex differences in the cerebral organization of verbal functions in patients with unilateral brain lesions. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  N Makris,et al.  Location of lesions in stroke patients with deficits in syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[28]  G. Mcreddie Aphasia , 1868, The Indian medical gazette.

[29]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Function of the left planum temporale in auditory and linguistic processing , 1996, NeuroImage.

[30]  E. Ross,et al.  Topography of the Human Corpus Callosum , 1985, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[31]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.