Chronic nodules of sigmoid perforation caused by incarcerated intrauterine contraception device

Rationale: It is extremely rare for an intrauterine contraception device (IUD) to cause uterine perforation and Sigmoid perforation for a long time without being detected. Patient concerns: We present a case of a patient who has suffered from abdominal pain after 4 years of placement of an IUD, and found that the IUD was incarcerated by ultrasound. Diagnoses: Laparoscopic and hysteroscopic examination revealed that the incarcerated IUD caused uterine perforation and sigmoid perforation for a long time. One end of the intrauterine device completely penetrated the anterior wall muscle layer of the uterus and the full layer of the sigmoid colon, located in the intestinal lumen, and the perforated portion of the sigmoid colon formed a chronic nodule. Interventions: We extended the sigmoid colon perforation and uterine perforation by laparoscopy, removed the incarcerated IUD from the uterus through the vagina, trimmed the chronic nodules of the sigmoid perforation, repaired the sigmoid colon, and repaired the uterine perforation. Outcomes: The patient was cured and discharged 22 days after surgery. The patient was naturally pregnant 3 months after surgery and delivered by cesarean section 12 months after surgery. We saw a good recovery of the uterus and sigmoid colon during cesarean section. Lessons: The patient was placed with an intrauterine device made of a special material and was not monitored after placement, causing the uterus and sigmoid perforation to be undetected for a long time. The IUD placed in the patient should be monitored regularly. If the IUD is found to be incarcerated or displaced, attention should be paid to uterine perforation and intestinal perforation.

[1]  P. Zhang,et al.  Extensive intravesical benign hyperplasia induced by an extravesical migrated intrauterine device , 2019, Medicine.

[2]  Longlei Cao,et al.  Migration of a foreign body to the rectum , 2018, Medicine.

[3]  Yong-Seok Cho,et al.  Colonoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device That Had Perforated the Rectosigmoid Colon , 2018, Annals of coloproctology.

[4]  M. Xue,et al.  Clinical characteristic and intraoperative findings of uterine perforation patients in using of intrauterine devices (IUDs) , 2018, Gynecological Surgery.

[5]  I. Korbi,et al.  Pelvic abscess complicating sigmoid colon perforation by migrating intrauterine device: A case report and review of the literature , 2017, International journal of surgery case reports.

[6]  B. Kaneshiro,et al.  Women's willingness and ability to feel the strings of their intrauterine device , 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[7]  D. Horwell,et al.  Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives , 2016, Open access journal of contraception.

[8]  S. Reed,et al.  Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. , 2015, Contraception.

[9]  K. Kho,et al.  Perforated intraperitoneal intrauterine contraceptive devices: diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes. , 2014, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[10]  M. Gissler,et al.  Intrauterine contraception: incidence and factors associated with uterine perforation--a population-based study. , 2012, Human reproduction.

[11]  M. Ingec,et al.  Minimally invasive approach to cases of lost intra-uterine device: a 7-year experience. , 2011, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[12]  V. Advani,et al.  Laparoscopic Removal of a Copper Intrauterine Device from the Sigmoid Colon , 2011, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.