Exploring the relationship between the built environment, trip chain complexity, and auto mode choice, applying a large national data set

Abstract In the completion of transport-based activities, some people save time by chaining trips with different purposes. Several studies have found that trip chaining encourages car use, while others find that features of the built environment can enable complex trip chains without the use of the car. Relatively few studies have presented analyses of trip chains and mode choice that also include built environment variables, although it is well established that urban density and urban structure influence on the transport mode distribution. In this paper we explore the relationship between the built environment, trip chaining, and auto mode choice in Norway. We apply national travel survey data, deriving commuting and non-commuting home-to-home trip chains, terming trip chains with more than two legs “complex”. We add built-environment measures, including the density of inhabitants plus employments, and their balance, the number of public parking lots and transit stops/stations, as well as the distance to the nearest urban centre. We run models splitting the travel survey data into two subsets, one more urban and the other more rural. We find that higher minimum density at destinations is consistently associated with lower odds of a complex trip chain and of auto mode choice. Longer distance from the residence to the nearest centre increases the odds of car use, and reduces the odds of a complex trip chain. The association with other built-environment characteristics depends on area type and whether it is commuting or not. A higher maximum distance from a destination to an urban centre increases the odds of a complex trip chain and auto mode choice in the more urban subset of the data, but in the more rural subset of the data such association is only found for commuting trip chains. The job-population balance in the home area shows negative association with auto mode choice; and in the more urban subset also a negative association with complex commuting trip chains. The more urban subset comprised municipalities with registered numbers of public parking lots; a higher minimum parking lot number at destinations in the trip chain was associated with lower odds of a complex trip chain, as well as higher odds of choosing the car as the main mode in non-commuting trip chains.

[1]  L. Frank,et al.  Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice , 2007 .

[2]  Petter Næss,et al.  Examining the effects of the built environment on auto ownership in two Norwegian urban regions , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[3]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Trip-Chaining Behavior , 2005 .

[4]  Graham Currie,et al.  Exploring the trip chaining behaviour of public transport users in Melbourne , 2011 .

[5]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Traffic Generated by Mixed-Use Developments—13-Region Study Using Consistent Built Environment Measures , 2011 .

[6]  Sylvia Y. He,et al.  Potential of converting short car trips to active trips: The role of the built environment in tour-based travel , 2017 .

[7]  N. Fearnley,et al.  Parking facilities and the built environment: Impacts on travel behaviour , 2017 .

[8]  J. Scheiner,et al.  Women’s complex daily lives: a gendered look at trip chaining and activity pattern entropy in Germany , 2017 .

[9]  Gulsah Akar,et al.  Using trip chaining and joint travel as mediating variables to explore the relationships among travel behavior, socio-demographics, and urban form , 2017 .

[10]  Andrew Carse,et al.  The factors influencing car use in a cycle-friendly city: the case of Cambridge , 2013, Journal of transport geography.

[11]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Incorporating trip chaining into analysis of destination choice , 1984 .

[12]  Cynthia Chen,et al.  Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density , 2008 .

[13]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[14]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[15]  K. Krizek Neighborhood services, trip purpose, and tour-based travel , 2003 .

[16]  A. Heppenstall,et al.  Daily travel behaviour in Beijing, China: An analysis of workers' trip chains, and the role of socio-demographics and urban form , 2014 .

[17]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  SMART: simulation model for activities, resources and travel , 1996 .

[18]  Ming Zhang The Role of Land Use in Travel Mode Choice: Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong , 2004 .

[19]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research , 1999 .

[20]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels , 2007 .

[21]  Petter Næss,et al.  Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context , 2012 .

[22]  Michael A. P. Taylor,et al.  Defining and understanding trip chaining behaviour , 2007 .

[23]  Dorian Bautista-Hernández Urban structure and its influence on trip chaining complexity in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area , 2020 .

[24]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies , 2008 .

[25]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  Effect of Employment Site Characteristics on Commute Mode Choice , 2002 .

[26]  Konstadinos G. Goulias,et al.  Application of Poisson Regression Models to Activity Frequency Analysis and Prediction , 1999 .

[27]  Thérèse Steenberghen,et al.  Space and time related determinants of public transport use in trip chains , 2006 .

[28]  Khandker Nurul Habib,et al.  Unraveling the relationship between trip chaining and mode choice: evidence from a multi-week travel diary , 2012 .

[29]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  Practical Approach to Model Trip Chaining , 1998 .

[30]  N. McGuckin,et al.  Examining Trip-Chaining Behavior: Comparison of Travel by Men and Women , 1999 .

[31]  Roya Etminani-Ghasrodashti,et al.  The impacts of built environment on home-based work and non-work trips: An empirical study from Iran , 2016 .

[32]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[33]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Exploring the connections among job accessibility, employment, income, and auto ownership using structural equation modeling , 2007 .

[34]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  A Simultaneous Model of Household Activity Participation and Trip Chain Generation , 1999 .

[35]  Xuewu Chen,et al.  An exploration of the relationships between socioeconomics, land use and daily trip chain pattern among low-income residents , 2016 .

[36]  Xin Ye,et al.  An Exploration of the Relationship Between Mode Choice and Complexity of Trip Chaining Patterns , 2007 .

[37]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Influence of Land Use on Tour Complexity: A Dutch Case , 2006 .

[38]  Alexander Teytelboym,et al.  Part I: Externalities and economic policies in road transport , 2010 .

[39]  Na Chen,et al.  Influence of neighborhood types on trip distances: Spatial error models for Central Ohio , 2016 .

[40]  Daniel G. Chatman,et al.  How Density and Mixed Uses at the Workplace Affect Personal Commercial Travel and Commute Mode Choice , 2003 .

[41]  J. Strathman,et al.  Effects of household structure and selected travel characteristics on trip chaining , 1994 .

[42]  D. Hensher,et al.  Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport , 2000 .

[43]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[44]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Including Minor Modes of Transport in Tour-Based Mode Choice Model with Household Interactions , 2008 .

[45]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship , 2010 .

[46]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity‐based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems , 1992 .

[47]  Petter Næss,et al.  Residential location, workplace location and car driving in four Norwegian cities , 2018, European Planning Studies.