Superficial bladder cancer: the response of a marker tumour to a single intravesical instillation of epirubicin.

OBJECTIVE To determine the response of a marker tumour to a single instillation of intravesical epirubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty-one patients (54 men, 27 women) with a mean age of 69.3 years (range 36-92) with superficial bladder cancer were randomized to receive a single instillation of intravesical epirubicin. At the initial cystoscopy all but one papillary marker tumour was resected. Subsequently the patients were randomized to receive either intravesical epirubicin at a concentration of 1 mg/ml (n = 40) or 2 mg/ml (n = 41) in 50 ml of saline for 1 h. The response of the marker tumour was determined at 3 months (first check cystoscopy). The toxicity associated with both treatments was also recorded. RESULTS A complete response (no visible or microscopic bladder carcinoma) was observed in 46% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35-57%) of patients. No patient experienced systemic side-effects. Chemical cystitis and bladder irritability were the most frequent local side-effects, occurring in 15% (95% CI 8-24%) of the patients. CONCLUSIONS A single instillation of intravesical epirubicin has a demonstrable effect in superficial bladder cancer. The results compare favourably with more onerous regimes. Side-effects were minimal at 1 mg/ml and acceptable at 2 mg/ml.

[1]  R Sylvester,et al.  A prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group randomized trial comparing transurethral resection followed by a single intravesical instillation of epirubicin or water in single stage Ta, T1 papillary carcinoma of the bladder. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[2]  D. Lamm,et al.  Long-term results of intravesical therapy for superficial bladder cancer. , 1992, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[3]  G. Barbalias,et al.  Intravesical instillations of 4-epi-doxorubicin (epirubicin) in the prophylactic treatment of superficial bladder cancer: results of a controlled prospective study. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[4]  T. Tammela,et al.  Intravesical epirubicin with and without verapamil for the prophylaxis of superficial bladder tumours. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[5]  D. Newling,et al.  A multi-centre phase two study of intravesical epirubicin in the treatment of superficial bladder tumour. , 1990, European urology.

[6]  L S Freedman,et al.  Prognostic factors for recurrence and followup policies in the treatment of superficial bladder cancer: report from the British Medical Research Council Subgroup on Superficial Bladder Cancer (Urological Cancer Working Party). , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[7]  M. Parmar,et al.  Effect of intravesical mitomycin C on recurrence of newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer: interim report from the Medical Research Council Subgroup on Superficial Bladder Cancer (Urological Cancer Working Party) , 1988, British medical journal.

[8]  L. Denis,et al.  Intravesical chemoresection with 4'-epi-doxorubicin in patients with superficial bladder tumors. , 1988, European urology.

[9]  A B West,et al.  Superficial bladder tumors (stage pTa, grades 1 and 2): the importance of recurrence pattern following initial resection. , 1986, The Journal of urology.

[10]  R. J. Cersosimo,et al.  Epirubicin: a review of the pharmacology, clinical activity, and adverse effects of an adriamycin analogue. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  S. Loening,et al.  Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[12]  H. C. Jones,et al.  Thiotepa in the treatment of tumours of the bladder. , 1961, Lancet.