Structural performance and sustainability assessment of cold central-plant and in-place recycled asphalt pavements: A case study

This paper aimed at assessing the structural performance and sustainability of cold recycled asphalt pavements. Four cold recycling technologies were investigated, including the cold central-plant recycling with emulsified and foamed asphalt binders (i.e., CCPR-E and CCPR-F), and the cold in-place recycling with emulsified and foamed asphalt binders (i.e., CIR-E and CIR-F). Firstly, the laboratory tests were conducted to comprehensively evaluate the dynamic modulus, rutting, and cracking performance of cold recycled asphalt mixtures. Subsequently, these laboratory results were used to determine the inputs of cold recycled asphalt mixtures for the Pavement ME Design program, which was employed to predict the pavement performance. Meanwhile, the National Center for Asphalt Technology also constructed four cold recycled pavement sections in the field. The monitored and predicted pavement performance showed similar trends in the first two years, but the Pavement ME Design program over predicted the rut depth of these sections. The pavement performance results confirmed that the bottom-up fatigue cracking was a negligible distress mode for cold recycled asphalt pavements. In the following, the life cycle cost analysis and life cycle assessment were conducted to evaluate the four different cold recycling projects. The life cycle cost analysis results demonstrated that all of the four cold recycling projects yielded less net present values than the HMA project. The life cycle assessment data indicated that the cold recycling technologies reduced the energy consumption by 56–64%, and decreased the greenhouse gas emissions by 39–46%. Finally, this study found that the overlay and asphalt treated base thicknesses and climatic conditions had significant impact on the performance of cold recycled asphalt pavements.

[1]  M. Jalili,et al.  Effect of Portland cement and lime additives on properties of cold in-place recycled mixtures with asphalt emulsion , 2009 .

[2]  Yang H. Huang,et al.  Pavement Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[3]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  Initial Performance of Virginia's Interstate 81 In-Place Pavement Recycling Project , 2015 .

[4]  Fan Gu,et al.  Energy-based crack initiation model for load-related top-down cracking in asphalt pavement , 2018 .

[5]  N. Tran,et al.  Optimising water content in cold recycled foamed asphalt mixtures , 2017 .

[8]  Pietro Leandri,et al.  Field validation of recycled cold mixes viscoelastic properties , 2015 .

[9]  Rebekah Yang,et al.  Development of a pavement life cycle assessment tool utilizing regional data and introducing an asphalt binder model , 2014 .

[10]  Fujian Ni,et al.  An experimental study on fatigue properties of emulsion and foam cold recycled mixes , 2010 .

[11]  Yongjoo Kim,et al.  Development of Mix Design Procedure for Cold In-Place Recycling with Foamed Asphalt , 2006 .

[12]  A. R. Pasandín,et al.  Recycled construction and demolition waste in Cold Asphalt Mixtures: evolutionary properties , 2016 .

[13]  Becca Lane,et al.  Implementation of Cold In-Place Recycling with Expanded Asphalt Technology in Canada , 2005 .

[14]  Andrea Grilli,et al.  Compactability and thermal sensitivity of cement–bitumen-treated materials , 2012 .

[15]  Sadie Smith,et al.  Comparing layer types for the use of PavementME for asphalt emulsion Full Depth Reclamation design , 2018 .

[16]  Ashley Buss,et al.  Long-Term Evaluation of Cold-in-Place Recycling and Factors Influencing Performance , 2017 .

[17]  Yongjoo Kim,et al.  Dynamic Modulus and Repeated Load Tests of Cold In-Place Recycling Mixtures Using Foamed Asphalt , 2009 .

[18]  Charles W. Schwartz,et al.  Mechanistic structural properties of foamed asphalt stabilised base materials , 2015 .

[19]  Becca Lane,et al.  Sustainable Pavements , 2008 .

[20]  Ciaran McNally,et al.  Specification development for cold in-situ recycling of asphalt , 2016 .

[21]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  In-Place Pavement Recycling on I-81 in Virginia , 2012 .

[22]  D. Timm,et al.  Structural Coefficients of Cold Central-Plant Recycled Asphalt Mixtures , 2017 .

[23]  B. Diefenderfer,et al.  Material Properties of Cold In-Place Recycled and Full-Depth Reclamation Asphalt Concrete , 2017 .

[24]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  Evaluation of Dynamic Modulus in Asphalt Paving Mixtures Utilizing Small-Scale Specimen Geometries , 2015 .

[25]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Using overlay test to evaluate fracture properties of field-aged asphalt concrete , 2015 .

[26]  Randy C West,et al.  A Review of the Alabama Department of Transportation’s Policies and Procedures for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement Type Selection , 2013 .

[27]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Improved Methodology to Evaluate Fracture Properties of Warm-Mix Asphalt Using Overlay Test , 2015 .

[28]  Andrea Grilli,et al.  A study on the mechanical behaviour of cement–bitumen treated materials , 2011 .

[29]  Z. Leng,et al.  Cold recycling of reclaimed asphalt pavement towards improved engineering performance , 2018 .

[30]  Yue Xiao,et al.  Dynamic characteristics of 100% cold recycled asphalt mixture using asphalt emulsion and cement , 2017 .

[31]  Mostafa A. Elseifi,et al.  Mechanistic-empirical pavement performance of asphalt mixtures with recycled asphalt shingles , 2018 .

[32]  Guillermo Thenoux,et al.  Energy consumption comparison for different asphalt pavements rehabilitation techniques used in Chile , 2007 .

[33]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  Dynamic Modulus of Recycled Pavement Mixtures , 2016 .

[34]  Janez Turk,et al.  Environmental comparison of two alternative road pavement rehabilitation techniques: cold-in-place-recycling versus traditional reconstruction , 2016 .

[35]  Arianna Stimilli,et al.  Performance evaluation of a cold-recycled mixture containing high percentage of reclaimed asphalt , 2013 .