Fuel electricity and plug-in electric vehicles in a low carbon fuel standard

Electricity is unique among the alternative fuels in a low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) policy, in that demand from vehicles is the major barrier to its usage, not supply. This paper presents a policy discussion and policy recommendations on a number of topics related to the regulation and incentives for fuel electricity within the LCFS. In the near-term, the LCFS will have a limited role in incentivizing the use of electricity and lowering the carbon intensity of electricity, and electricity will play a small role in meeting LCFS targets. Calculating a carbon intensity value for electricity is a complex process, requiring many decisions and trade-offs to be made, including allocation methods, system boundaries, temporal resolution and how to treat electricity demand for vehicle charging. These choices along with other regulatory decisions about who can obtain LCFS credits will influence the incentives for providing electricity and charging infrastructure relative to other low-carbon fuels as well as across different electricity providers. The paper discusses how fuel electricity would fit into an LCFS, identifying those special characteristics that could reduce the effectiveness of the policy. It also provides specific recommendations to enable better policy design that appropriately incentivizes the use of low-carbon fuels.

[1]  R. Plevin,et al.  A Low-Carbon Fuel Standard for California , 2007 .

[2]  Scott Jiusto,et al.  The differences that methods make: Cross-border power flows and accounting for carbon emissions from electricity use , 2006 .

[3]  Pooya Soltantabar.  Annual Energy Outlook , 2015 .

[4]  M. K. Singh,et al.  Multi-path transportation futures study : vehicle characterization and scenario analyses. , 2009 .

[5]  Christopher Yang,et al.  Meeting an 80% Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Transportation by 2050: A Case Study in California , 2009 .

[6]  K. S. Gallagher,et al.  Giving Green to Get Green: Incentives and Consumer Adoption of Hybrid Vehicle Technology , 2008 .

[7]  Christopher Yang,et al.  Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle GHG Impacts in California: Integrating Consumer-Informed Recharge Profiles with an Electricity-Dispatch Model , 2011 .

[8]  Matthew A Kromer,et al.  Electric powertrains : opportunities and challenges in the US light-duty vehicle fleet , 2007 .

[9]  Urmila M. Diwekar,et al.  New stochastic simulation capability applied to greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation (Greet) model , 2006 .

[10]  Christopher Yang,et al.  Determining marginal electricity for near-term plug-in and fuel cell vehicle demands in California: Impacts on vehicle greenhouse gas emissions , 2009 .

[11]  Stanton W. Hadley,et al.  Potential Impacts of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles on Regional Power Generation , 2009 .

[12]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories , 2005 .

[13]  D. Greene.  How Consumers Value Fuel Economy: A Literature Review , 2010 .

[14]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Toward a global low carbon fuel standard , 2010 .

[15]  C. Weber,et al.  Life cycle assessment and grid electricity: what do we know and what can we know? , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  Modeling transitions in the California light-duty vehicles sector to achieve deep reductions in transportation greenhouse gas emissions. , 2012 .

[17]  Constantine Samaras,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Sujit Das,et al.  Low-carbon fuel standard—Status and analytic issues , 2010 .