Early Interventions for Children with Reading Disabilities.

We examined the effectiveness of 3 different reading interventions in second and third graders with identified reading disabilities. Fourteen special education teachers taught 114 second and third graders either synthetic phonics, analytic phonics, or sight-word programs in the resource room 60 min a day for 1 school year. Growth in phonological and orthographic processing and word reading was compared for the 3 interventions. Facilitative effects of synthetic phonics were reduced when demo- graphic and Verbal IQ covariates were included in the growth-curve models. How- ever, the most significant mediator of intervention effects was initial differences in phonological and orthographic processing skills. Implications for service delivery and identification of children for special education are discussed.

[1]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  Developmental Lag versus Deficit Models of Reading Disability: A Longitudinal, Individual Growth Curves Analysis. , 1996 .

[2]  Charles W. Mueller,et al.  Measures of socioeconomic status: Alternatives and recommendations. , 1981 .

[3]  Anne E. Fowler,et al.  Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. , 1994 .

[4]  I. S. Brown,et al.  Effects of instruction on beginning reading skills in children at risk for reading disability , 1990 .

[5]  David Rogosa,et al.  A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. , 1982 .

[6]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  Early Interventions for Children With Reading Problems: Study Designs and Preliminary Findings , 1997 .

[7]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[8]  M. Lovett.  Treating the Core Deficits of Developmental Dyslexia: Evidence of Transfer of Learning after Phonologically- and Strategy-Based Reading Training Programs. , 1994 .

[9]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Preventive and Remedial Interventions for Children with Severe Reading Disabilities , 1997 .

[10]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Application of Hierarchical Linear Models to Assessing Change , 1987 .

[11]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Development of Reading-Related Phonological Processing Abilities: New Evidence of Bidirectional Causality from a Latent Variable Longitudinal Study. , 1994 .

[12]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. , 1994 .

[13]  N M Thompson,et al.  Analysis of change: modeling individual growth. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  L. Siegel,et al.  Evidence for Superior Orthographic Skills in Dyslexics , 1995 .

[15]  John B. Willett,et al.  Questions and Answers in the Measurement of Change , 1988 .

[16]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[17]  Edward R. Sipay,et al.  Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disability , 1996 .

[18]  D. Francis,et al.  The measurement of change: Assessing behavior over time and within a developmental context. , 1994 .

[19]  Frank R. Vellutino,et al.  Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition : convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction , 1991 .

[20]  Barbara R. Foorman,et al.  Effects of Three Orthographic/Phonological Units on First-Grade Reading , 1992 .

[21]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  Relation of phonological and orthographic processing to early reading: Comparing two approaches to regression-based, reading-level-match designs. , 1996 .