Subsentential utterances, ellipsis, and pragmatic enrichment

It is argued that genuinely subsentential phrases, such as a discourse-initial utterance of “From France” to indicate the provenance of an item, provide evidence for the reality of the pragmatic process of free enrichment. I consider recent attempts to treat such discourse-initial fragments as linguistic ellipsis of some kind while accommodating the difference between these cases and accepted types of ellipsis such as sluicing and gapping (for example Merchant 2007a,b). I claim that the mechanisms they posit to save an ellipsis story have no role in an account of performance (an account of the processes of utterance interpretation). An argument against the enrichment approach from the indeterminacy of the content of subsentential utterances is discussed, and refuted, and it is shown how this indeterminacy is accommodated in a contextualist pragmatic theory.

[1]  Ellen Barton.  1. Toward a nonsentential analysis in generative grammar , 2006 .

[2]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication , 2002 .

[3]  J. Stanley.  Context and Logical Form , 2000 .

[4]  J. King,et al.  Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Role of Semantic Content , 2005 .

[5]  Jason Stanley,et al.  On Quantifier Domain Restriction , 2000 .

[6]  Robert J. Stainton,et al.  Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy of Language , 2006 .

[7]  H. Wettstein.  Demonstrative reference and definite descriptions , 1981 .

[8]  François Recanati,et al.  Unarticulated Constituents , 2002 .

[9]  L. Clapp.  ON THE INTERPRETATION AND PERFORMANCE OF NON-SENTENTIAL ASSERTIONS* , 2005 .

[10]  Robert J. Stainton,et al.  Neither Fragments nor Ellipsis , 2006 .

[11]  J. Saul,et al.  Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. , 1993 .

[12]  G. Fitch.  Belief ascription , 1986 .

[13]  Jason Merchant.  3. “Small structures”: A sententialist perspective , 2006 .

[14]  Andrew Botterell.  Knowledge by Acquaintance and Meaning in Isolation , 2005 .

[15]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[16]  Robert J. Stainton,et al.  The Pragmatics of Non-sentences , 2004 .

[17]  E. Lepore,et al.  Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism , 2005 .

[18]  Peter Ludlow.  Referential Semantics for I‐Languages? , 2008 .

[19]  Kepa Korta Carrión.  Insensitive semantics. A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism (Herman Cappelen and Erni Lepore) , 2005 .

[20]  Peter Ludlow,et al.  A Note on Alleged Cases of Nonsentential Assertion , 2005 .

[21]  J. Stanley.  Semantics in context , 2005 .

[22]  R. Stainton.  Using Non-Sentences: An Application of Relevance Theory , 1994 .

[23]  Kate Paesani,et al.  The syntax of nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives , 2006 .

[24]  Kenneth A. Taylor,et al.  Sex, Breakfast, And Descriptus Interruptus , 2001, Synthese.

[25]  P. Carruthers.  The cognitive functions of language , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Fragments and ellipsis , 2005 .

[27]  Jason Stanley,et al.  Making it Articulated , 2002 .

[28]  Grasping Objects and Contents , 2003 .

[29]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Explicature and semantics. , 2000 .

[30]  Robert J. Stainton,et al.  Shorthand, Syntactic Ellipsis, and the Pragmatic Determinants of What Is Said , 2004 .

[31]  Robert J. Stainton,et al.  Introduction to Ellipsis and Non-Sentential Speech , 2005 .

[32]  George Fam Powell,et al.  Language, Thought and Reference , 2010 .