A FIELD STUDY OF INCLINE USE AND PREFERRED SPEEDS FOR THE LOCOMOTION OF LIZARDS

The maximal running speeds of lizards have commonly been measured using level racetracks in a laboratory, but the normal speeds of locomotion of lizards and most animals in their natural habitats are not well documented. Thus we quantified the locomotor activity of the lizard Uma scoparia in its natural sand-dune habitat to determine how commonly animals run near their maximal speed and how inclines in the environment might affect habitat use and the speed of locomotion. We used leaf blowers to erase footprints in the sand in three 40 m x 100 m plots differing in surface topography and vegetation and then measured attributes of the paths and tracks left by U. scoparia that were not disturbed (by observers) during their period of peak activity. Laboratory observations allowed us to estimate speed for each field measurement of stride length (n = 5993). The frequency distribution of stride speed had two distinct modes (mean values 0.25 and 2.00 m/s), for which only the lower one is likely to be aerobically sustainable. Bipedal locomotion was extremely rare (<0.5% of all strides), but much undisturbed locomotion was unex- pectedly fast. The inclines of the surfaces upon which locomotion occurred conformed to random habitat use. In contrast, the inclines of paths made by lizards had lower than expected amounts of nearly horizontal locomotion and a propensity for traveling almost directly uphill, especially when surfaces were steep. Habitat structure varied significantly among plots and affected several aspects of locomotion. For example, path length, average speed per path, and average magnitudes of path and surface inclines per path varied significantly among the three plots. Multiple regression analysis also revealed that the average speed per 1-m interval was maximized for paths with relatively shallow downhill slopes (-6% grade) and decreased significantly both with increased amounts of vegetative cover and increased turning between successive intervals. Unexpectedly, during undisturbed and es- cape locomotion, lizards used inclines similarly.

[1]  R. Full,et al.  Biology of the Land Crabs: ENERGETICS AND LOCOMOTION , 1988 .

[2]  B. Jayne,et al.  Effects of incline on speed, acceleration, body posture and hindlimb kinematics in two species of lizard Callisaurus draconoides and Uma scoparia. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  R J Full,et al.  Intermittent exercise alters endurance in an eight-legged ectotherm. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  R J Full,et al.  Performance Limits of Low‐Temperature, Continuous Locomotion Are Exceeded When Locomotion Is Intermittent in the Ghost Crab , 1998, Physiological Zoology.

[5]  R. Huey,et al.  EFFECTS OF BODY SIZE AND SLOPE ON SPRINT SPEED OF A LIZARD (STELLIO (AGAMA) STELLIO) , 1982 .

[6]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Preferred speeds in terrestrial vertebrates: are they equivalent? , 1988, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  S. Thompson Bipedal Hopping and Seed‐dispersion Selection by Heteromyid Rodents: The Role of Locomotion Energetics , 1985 .

[8]  B. Jayne,et al.  How inclines affect the escape behaviour of a dune-dwelling lizard, Uma scoparia , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Robert D. Stevenson,et al.  Integrating Thermal Physiology and Ecology of Ectotherms: A Discussion of Approaches , 1979 .

[10]  T. Garland,et al.  Time Budgets, Thermoregulation, and Maximal Locomotor Performance: Are Reptiles Olympians or Boy Scouts? , 1988 .

[11]  T. Garland,et al.  Repeatability of Individual Differences in Locomotor Performance and Body Size During Early Ontogeny of the Lizard Sceloporus Occidentalis (Baird & Girard) , 1989 .

[12]  Milton Hildebrand,et al.  Analysis of Tetrapod Gaits: General Considerations and Symmetrical Gaits , 1976 .

[13]  T. Garland Chapter 11. Phylogenetic Analyses of Lizard Endurance Capacity in Relation to Body Size and Body Temperature , 1994 .

[14]  R. Huey,et al.  REPEATABILITY OF LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF THE LIZARD SCELOPORUS MERRIAMI , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  B. Jayne,et al.  Comparative three-dimensional kinematics of the hindlimb for high-speed bipedal and quadrupedal locomotion of lizards , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses , 1981, Nature.

[17]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Morphology, Performance and Fitness , 1983 .

[18]  W. Cooper Chapter 5. Prey Chemical Discrimination, Foraging Mode, and Phylogeny , 1994 .

[19]  P. Turchin Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[20]  Farley,et al.  Efficiency of uphill locomotion in nocturnal and diurnal lizards , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  J. Stamps,et al.  Motor Learning and the Value of Familiar Space , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Fieler Effects of speed on the hindlimb kinematics of the lizard dipsosaurus dorsalis , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[23]  T. Garland,et al.  Ecological Morphology of Locomotor Performance in Squamate Reptiles , 2022 .

[24]  P. Willems,et al.  Mechanics and energetics of human locomotion on sand. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  N. T. Hobbs,et al.  Travel in alpine terrain: energy expenditures for locomotion by mountain goats and bighorn sheep , 1989 .

[26]  C. Pennycuick On the running of the gnu (Connochaetes taurinus) and other animals , 1975 .

[27]  R. C. Stebbins Some Aspects of the Ecology of the Iguanid Genus Uma , 1944 .

[28]  B. Jayne,et al.  A Field Study of the Effects of Incline on the Escape Locomotion of a Bipedal Lizard, Callisaurus draconoides , 1999, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[29]  J. H. Carothers,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION: TOE FRINGES IN THE SAND‐DWELLING LIZARD UMA SCOPARIA , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  N. Heglund,et al.  Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. I. Metabolic energy consumption as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[31]  R. Huey,et al.  Effects of Body Size and Slope on Acceleration of a Lizard (Stellio Stellio) , 1984 .

[32]  D. K. Hews Lizard ecology: Historical and experimental perspectives , 1995 .

[33]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  SPEED AND TIME-ENERGY BUDGET FOR LOCOMOTION IN GOLDEN-MANTLED GROUND SQUIRRELS' , 1989 .

[34]  J. Losos,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF MAXIMAL LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE IN CARIBBEAN ANOLIS LIZARDS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  SELECTION ON LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE CAPACITY IN A NATURAL POPULATION OF GARTER SNAKES , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  Bieke Vanhooydonck,et al.  Variation in morphology, gait characteristics and speed of locomotion in two populations of lizards , 1998 .

[37]  S. Bulova Ecological Correlates of Population and Individual Variation in Antipredator Behavior of Two Species of Desert Lizards , 1994 .