Why Ecosystem-Based Management May Fail without Changes to Tool Development and Financing

Resource managers rely on tools to enact ecosystem-based management (EBM) principles and frequently express frustration at the difficulty of use and unreliability of available tools. EBM tool developers lack the consistent, long-term funding needed to develop high-quality tools. Through interviews, we determined several reasons for this funding problem including: (a) most EBM tools are developed by academics rather than software professionals and (b) most tools are offered at no cost. These factors create a double-edged sword for managers who cannot afford high license fees or to waste time with low-quality, unmaintained products. Without a fundamental shift in tool funding and development, many potentially useful tools will remain poorly implemented and underused. Without a significant increase in the number of high-quality EBM tools, governmental mandates to implement EBM will remain unfulfilled. This problem can be addressed if both developers and funders change the ways in which they seek and grant financial support.

[1]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization , 2009 .

[2]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Effectiveness of marine reserve networks in representing biodiversity and minimizing impact to fishermen: a comparison of two approaches used in California , 2008 .

[3]  Heather M. Leslie,et al.  Using siting algorithms in the design of marine reserve networks , 2003 .

[4]  H. Possingham,et al.  Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools , 2009, Environmental Conservation.

[5]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[6]  Craig Larman,et al.  Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide , 2003 .

[7]  Daniel C. Dunn,et al.  Marine Geospatial Ecology Tools: An integrated framework for ecological geoprocessing with ArcGIS, Python, R, MATLAB, and C++ , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Jason S. Link,et al.  Analyzing the tradeoffs among ecological and fishing effects on an example fish community: A multispecies (fisheries) production model , 2009 .

[9]  W. Royce.  Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques , 2021, ICSE '87.

[10]  Miguel B. Araújo,et al.  Systematic Conservation Planning Comes of Age , 2009 .

[11]  Jason S. Link,et al.  An expansion of the MSVPA approach for quantifying predator-prey interactions in exploited fish communities , 2010 .

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[13]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Complex interplays among population dynamics, environmental forcing, and exploitation in fisheries , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Castilla,et al.  The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems , 1997 .

[15]  F. Berkes.  Implementing ecosystem-based management: evolution or revolution? , 2012 .

[16]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  OBIS-SEAMAP: developing a biogeographic research data commons for the ecological studies of marine mammals, seabirds, and sea turtles , 2006 .

[17]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  The C-plan conservation planning system: Origins, applications, and possible futures , 2009 .

[18]  Carol Grbich,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction , 2007 .

[19]  Xinhao Wang,et al.  Integrating water-quality management and land-use planning in a watershed context. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .