Brain–computer interface: Changes in performance using virtual reality techniques

The ability to control electroencephalographic (EEG) signals when different mental tasks are carried out would provide a method of communication for people with serious motor function problems. This system is known as a brain-computer interface (BCI). Due to the difficulty of controlling one's own EEG signals, a suitable training protocol is required to motivate subjects, as it is necessary to provide some type of visual feedback allowing subjects to see their progress. Conventional systems of feedback are based on simple visual presentations, such as a horizontal bar extension. However, virtual reality is a powerful tool with graphical possibilities to improve BCI-feedback presentation. The objective of the study is to explore the advantages of the use of feedback based on virtual reality techniques compared to conventional systems of feedback. Sixteen untrained subjects, divided into two groups, participated in the experiment. A group of subjects was trained using a BCI system, which uses conventional feedback (bar extension), and another group was trained using a BCI system, which submits subjects to a more familiar environment, such as controlling a car to avoid obstacles. The obtained results suggest that EEG behaviour can be modified via feedback presentation. Significant differences in classification error rates between both interfaces were obtained during the feedback period, confirming that an interface based on virtual reality techniques can improve the feedback control, specifically for untrained subjects.

[1]  E. Curran,et al.  Learning to control brain activity: A review of the production and control of EEG components for driving brain–computer interface (BCI) systems , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[2]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based communication: improved accuracy by response verification. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[6]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Walking from thought , 2006, Brain Research.

[7]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[8]  J R Wolpaw,et al.  EEG-based communication and control: short-term role of feedback. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Enhancement of left-right sensorimotor EEG differences during feedback-regulated motor imagery. , 1999, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[10]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Rapid prototyping of an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain–Computer Communication: Motivation, Aim, and Impact of Exploring a Virtual Apartment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Navigating Virtual Reality by Thought: What Is It Like? , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[13]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.