International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium consensus guidelines for target volume definition in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE Spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used to manage spinal metastases. However, target volume definition varies considerably and no consensus target volume guidelines exist. This study proposes consensus target volume definitions using common scenarios in metastatic spine radiosurgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS Seven radiation oncologists and 3 neurological surgeons with spinal radiosurgery expertise independently contoured target and critical normal structures for 10 cases representing common scenarios in metastatic spine radiosurgery. Each set of volumes was imported into the Computational Environment for Radiotherapy Research. Quantitative analysis was performed using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) with kappa statistics calculating agreement between physicians. Optimized confidence level consensus contours were identified using histogram agreement analysis and characterized to create target volume definition guidelines. RESULTS Mean STAPLE agreement sensitivity and specificity was 0.76 (range, 0.67-0.84) and 0.97 (range, 0.94-0.99), respectively, for gross tumor volume (GTV) and 0.79 (range, 0.66-0.91) and 0.96 (range, 0.92-0.98), respectively, for clinical target volume (CTV). Mean kappa agreement was 0.65 (range, 0.54-0.79) for GTV and 0.64 (range, 0.54-0.82) for CTV (P<.01 for GTV and CTV in all cases). STAPLE histogram agreement analysis identified optimal consensus contours (80% confidence limit). Consensus recommendations include that the CTV should include abnormal marrow signal suspicious for microscopic invasion and an adjacent normal bony expansion to account for subclinical tumor spread in the marrow space. No epidural CTV expansion is recommended without epidural disease, and circumferential CTVs encircling the cord should be used only when the vertebral body, bilateral pedicles/lamina, and spinous process are all involved or there is extensive metastatic disease along the circumference of the epidural space. CONCLUSIONS This report provides consensus guidelines for target volume definition for spinal metastases receiving upfront SRS in common clinical situations.

[1]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  A survey of stereotactic body radiotherapy use in the United States , 2011, Cancer.

[2]  Y. Yamada,et al.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases : current status , with a focus on its application in the postoperative patient A review , 2010 .

[3]  R. Jain,et al.  Radiosurgical decompression of metastatic epidural compression , 2010, Cancer.

[4]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis and its pattern of failure. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  M. Bilsky,et al.  Shifting Paradigms in the Treatment of Metastatic Spine Disease , 2009, Spine.

[6]  J. Sheehan Resident perceptions of radiosurgical training and the effect of a focused resident training seminar. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  Ping Wang,et al.  Accurate setup of paraspinal patients using a noninvasive patient immobilization cradle and portal imaging. , 2005, Medical physics.

[8]  C. Reddy,et al.  Marginal recurrence requiring salvage radiotherapy after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  P. Gerszten,et al.  Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery for Metastatic Spine Disease: What Are the Options, Indications, and Outcomes? , 2009, Spine.

[10]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  J. Sim,et al.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[12]  William C Welch,et al.  Radiosurgery for Spinal Metastases: Clinical Experience in 500 Cases From a Single Institution , 2007, Spine.

[13]  Steven D Chang,et al.  Image-guided Hypo-fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Spinal Lesions , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[14]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[15]  A. Mogilner,et al.  Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for tumors of the spine. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  Yoshiya Yamada,et al.  Reliability analysis of the epidural spinal cord compression scale. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[17]  D. Larson,et al.  Stereotactic body radiosurgery for spinal metastases: a critical review. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Y. Yamada,et al.  High-dose, single-fraction image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for metastatic spinal lesions. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  RTOG 0631 Phase II/III Study of Image-Guided Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Localized (1-3) Spine Metastases: Phase II Results. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Steven D Chang,et al.  Image-guided robotic radiosurgery for spinal metastases. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  J N Weinstein,et al.  Primary Bone Tumors of the Spine: Terminology and Surgical Staging , 1997, Spine.

[22]  Ehud Mendel,et al.  Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  Tools for consensus analysis of experts' contours for radiotherapy structure definitions. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  P. Gerszten,et al.  Spinal radiosurgery: a neurosurgical perspective. , 2011, Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT.