Reducing intersubject variability in motor unit number estimation

Motor unit number estimation (MUNE) attempts to directly assess the number of functioning motor units present in a muscle. It is an important addition to the electrodiagnostic evaluation; however, both intrasubject and intersubject reliability must be minimized for this technique to be clinically useful. A number of MUNE techniques have been developed. We propose a change in the way of calculating the MUNE, using the statistical technique described by Daube, and show that this modification reduces intersubject variability and improves test–retest reliability in normal subjects. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 22: 1457–1460, 1999

[1]  P J Delwaide,et al.  Number and relative size of thenar motor units estimated by an adapted multiple point stimulation method , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[2]  M J Campbell,et al.  Electrophysiological estimation of the number of motor units within a human muscle , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  W Wolf,et al.  Assessment of human motor unit twitches--a comparison of spike-triggered averaging and intramuscular microstimulation. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  J R Daube,et al.  Estimating the Number of Motor Units in a Muscle , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[5]  M. Bromberg Motor unit estimation: Reproducibility of the spike‐triggered averaging technique in normal and ALS subjects , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  T Doherty,et al.  Methods for Estimating the Numbers of Motor Units in Human Muscles , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.