Multivalent electrostatic microtubule interactions of synthetic peptides are sufficient to mimic advanced MAP-like behavior

Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) are a functionally highly diverse class of proteins that help to adjust the shape and function of the microtubule cytoskeleton in space and time. For this purpose, MAPs structurally support microtubules, modulate their dynamic instability, or regulate the activity of associated molecular motors. The microtubule-binding domains of MAPs are structurally divergent, but often depend on electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged surface of the microtubule. This suggests that the surface exposure of positive charges rather than a certain structural fold is sufficient for a protein to associate with microtubules. Consistently, positively charged artificial objects have been shown to associate with microtubules and to diffuse along their lattice. Natural MAPs, however, show a more sophisticated functionality beyond lattice-diffusion. Here, we asked whether basic electrostatic interactions are sufficient to also support advanced MAP functionality. To test this hypothesis, we studied simple positively charged peptide sequences for the occurrence of typical MAP-like behavior. We found that a multivalent peptide construct featuring four lysine-alanine heptarepeats (starPEG-(KA7)4)—but not its monovalent KA7-subunits—show advanced, biologically relevant MAP-like behavior: starPEG-(KA7)4 binds microtubules in the low nanomolar range, diffuses along their lattice with the ability to switch between intersecting microtubules, and tracks depolymerizing microtubule ends. Further, starPEG-(KA7)4 promotes microtubule nucleation and growth, mediates depolymerization coupled pulling at plus ends, and bundles microtubules without significantly interfering with other proteins on the microtubule lattice (as exemplified by the motor kinesin-1). Our results show that positive charges and multivalency are sufficient to mimic advanced MAP-like behavior.

[1]  F. McNally,et al.  Microtubule-severing enzymes: From cellular functions to molecular mechanism , 2018, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  G. Koenderink,et al.  Actin–microtubule crosstalk in cell biology , 2018, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  A. Hyman,et al.  Kinetically distinct phases of tau on microtubules regulate kinesin motors and severing enzymes , 2018, Nature Cell Biology.

[4]  I. Cheeseman,et al.  The kinetochore–microtubule interface at a glance , 2018, Journal of Cell Science.

[5]  E. Nogales,et al.  Near-atomic model of microtubule-tau interactions , 2018, Science.

[6]  H. Goodson,et al.  Microtubules and Microtubule-Associated Proteins. , 2018, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[7]  L. Rice,et al.  Microtubule dynamics: an interplay of biochemistry and mechanics , 2018, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  T. Kurth,et al.  Noncovalently Assembled Electroconductive Hydrogel. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[9]  A. Musacchio,et al.  Multivalency of NDC80 in the outer kinetochore is essential to track shortening microtubules and generate forces , 2018, eLife.

[10]  Sabine Petry,et al.  XMAP215 is a microtubule nucleation factor that functions synergistically with the gamma-tubulin ring complex , 2018, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  M. MacCoss,et al.  Human Ska complex and Ndc80 complex interact to form a load-bearing assembly that strengthens kinetochore–microtubule attachments , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  M. Steinmetz,et al.  A structural model for microtubule minus-end recognition and protection by CAMSAP proteins , 2017, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[13]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Propagation of Tau Aggregates and Neurodegeneration. , 2017, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  M. Goldberg Nuclear pore complex tethers to the cytoskeleton. , 2017, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[15]  K. Slep,et al.  TOG–tubulin binding specificity promotes microtubule dynamics and mitotic spindle formation , 2017, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  Yanlei Ma,et al.  ACF7 regulates inflammatory colitis and intestinal wound response by orchestrating tight junction dynamics , 2017, Nature Communications.

[17]  A. McAinsh,et al.  Congressing kinetochores progressively load Ska complexes to prevent force-dependent detachment , 2017, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  P. Jallepalli,et al.  Mps1 Regulates Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment Stability via the Ska Complex to Ensure Error-Free Chromosome Segregation. , 2017, Developmental cell.

[19]  C. Werner,et al.  Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf ( HZDR ) In vivo examination of an injectable hydrogel system crosslinked by peptide-oligosaccharide interaction in immunocompetent nude mice , 2018 .

[20]  J. Ávila,et al.  Tau antagonizes end-binding protein tracking at microtubule ends through a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism , 2016, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  P. Gönczy,et al.  The Human Centriolar Protein CEP135 Contains a Two-Stranded Coiled-Coil Domain Critical for Microtubule Binding. , 2016, Structure.

[22]  Myung Chul Choi,et al.  Tau mediates microtubule bundle architectures mimicking fascicles of microtubules found in the axon initial segment , 2016, Nature Communications.

[23]  S. Biggins,et al.  A TOG Protein Confers Tension Sensitivity to Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments , 2016, Cell.

[24]  T. Surrey,et al.  Complementary activities of TPX2 and chTOG constitute an efficient importin-regulated microtubule nucleation module , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[25]  Kian-Yong Lee,et al.  Direct interaction between centralspindlin and PRC1 reinforces mechanical resilience of the central spindle , 2015, Nature Communications.

[26]  L. Blanchoin,et al.  Tau co-organizes dynamic microtubule and actin networks , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[27]  S. Diez,et al.  Kinesin-1 motors can circumvent permanent roadblocks by side-shifting to neighboring protofilaments. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[28]  C. Hoogenraad,et al.  Microtubule Minus-End-Targeting Proteins , 2015, Current Biology.

[29]  J. Howard,et al.  The Motility of Axonemal Dynein Is Regulated by the Tubulin Code , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[30]  J. Ross,et al.  Kinesin Motor Transport is Altered by Macromolecular Crowding and Transiently Associated Microtubule-Associated Proteins , 2014, 1409.3455.

[31]  Samara L. Reck-Peterson,et al.  Reconstitution of dynein transport to the microtubule plus end by kinesin , 2014, eLife.

[32]  M. Singleton,et al.  The Kinesin-12 Kif15 is a processive track-switching tetramer , 2014, eLife.

[33]  Juri Rappsilber,et al.  Structural basis for microtubule recognition by the human kinetochore Ska complex , 2014, Nature Communications.

[34]  C. Neinhuis,et al.  Minimal peptide motif for non-covalent peptide-heparin hydrogels. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[35]  M. Bathe,et al.  The kinetochore-bound Ska1 complex tracks depolymerizing microtubules and binds to curved protofilaments. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[36]  Tim Scholz,et al.  Tau Protein Diffuses along the Microtubule Lattice* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  P. Duarte,et al.  BLD10/CEP135 is a microtubule-associated protein that controls the formation of the flagellum central microtubule pair. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[38]  A. Jeyaprakash,et al.  Structural and functional organization of the Ska complex, a key component of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[39]  Gergő Bohner,et al.  EBs Recognize a Nucleotide-Dependent Structural Cap at Growing Microtubule Ends , 2012, Cell.

[40]  F. Chang,et al.  Regulation of microtubule dynamics by TOG-domain proteins XMAP215/Dis1 and CLASP. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[41]  David Zwicker,et al.  Tracking single particles and elongated filaments with nanometer precision. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[42]  K. Verhey,et al.  Kinesin assembly and movement in cells. , 2011, Annual review of biophysics.

[43]  Jonathon Howard,et al.  XMAP215 polymerase activity is built by combining multiple tubulin-binding TOG domains and a basic lattice-binding region , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Tamir Gonen,et al.  Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments , 2010, Nature.

[45]  Christopher P. Arthur,et al.  Insights into Antiparallel Microtubule Crosslinking by PRC1, a Conserved Nonmotor Microtubule Binding Protein , 2010, Cell.

[46]  Ivo A. Telley,et al.  A Minimal Midzone Protein Module Controls Formation and Length of Antiparallel Microtubule Overlaps , 2010, Cell.

[47]  E. Katayama,et al.  One-dimensional Brownian motion of charged nanoparticles along microtubules: a model system for weak binding interactions. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[48]  I. A. Telley,et al.  Obstacles on the microtubule reduce the processivity of Kinesin-1 in a minimal in vitro system and in cell extract. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Erich A Nigg,et al.  Stable kinetochore–microtubule interactions depend on the Ska complex and its new component Ska3/C13Orf3 , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[50]  J. Yates,et al.  The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[51]  Andrew D. Franck,et al.  The Ndc80 Kinetochore Complex Forms Load-Bearing Attachments to Dynamic Microtubule Tips via Biased Diffusion , 2009, Cell.

[52]  Anna Akhmanova,et al.  Tracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[53]  Ram Dixit,et al.  Differential Regulation of Dynein and Kinesin Motor Proteins by Tau , 2008, Science.

[54]  Gary J. Brouhard,et al.  XMAP215 Is a Processive Microtubule Polymerase , 2008, Cell.

[55]  R. Vale,et al.  Structural basis of microtubule plus end tracking by XMAP215, CLIP-170, and EB1. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[56]  E. Nigg,et al.  Plk4-induced centriole biogenesis in human cells. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[57]  E. Nigg,et al.  Timely anaphase onset requires a novel spindle and kinetochore complex comprising Ska1 and Ska2 , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[58]  S. Feinstein,et al.  Evidence for two distinct binding sites for tau on microtubules. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  Elaine Fuchs,et al.  ACF7 An essential integrator of microtubule dynamics , 2003, Cell.

[60]  P. Brophy,et al.  KIF1D is a fast non‐processive kinesin that demonstrates novel K‐loop‐dependent mechanochemistry , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[61]  J. Howard,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2001 .

[62]  N. Hirokawa,et al.  Mechanism of the single-headed processivity: diffusional anchoring between the K-loop of kinesin and the C terminus of tubulin. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  E. Nogales,et al.  High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule , 1999, Cell.

[64]  N. Hirokawa,et al.  Point mutation of adenosine triphosphate-binding motif generated rigor kinesin that selectively blocks anterograde lysosome membrane transport , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[65]  B. Mickey,et al.  Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[66]  E. Mandelkow,et al.  Domains of tau protein and interactions with microtubules. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[67]  C. W. Scott,et al.  Tau protein induces bundling of microtubules in vitro: Comparison of different tau isoforms and a tau protein fragment , 1992, Journal of neuroscience research.

[68]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Mitosis , 1951, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[69]  J. McIntosh Mitosis. , 2016, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.