Bayesian Surface Warping Approach For Rectifying Geological Boundaries Using Displacement Likelihood And Evidence From Geochemical Assays

This paper presents a Bayesian framework for manipulating mesh surfaces with the aim of improving the positional integrity of the geological boundaries that they seek to represent. The assumption is that these surfaces, created initially using sparse data, capture the global trend and provide a reasonable approximation of the stratigraphic, mineralisation and other types of boundaries for mining exploration, but they are locally inaccurate at scales typically required for grade estimation. The proposed methodology makes local spatial corrections automatically to maximise the agreement between the modelled surfaces and observed samples. Where possible, vertices on a mesh surface are moved to provide a clear delineation, for instance, between ore and waste material across the boundary based on spatial and compositional analysis; using assay measurements collected from densely spaced, geo-registered blast holes. The maximum a posteriori (MAP) solution ultimately considers the chemistry observation likelihood in a given domain. Furthermore, it is guided by an apriori spatial structure which embeds geological domain knowledge and determines the likelihood of a displacement estimate. The results demonstrate that increasing surface fidelity can significantly improve grade estimation performance based on large-scale model validation.

[1]  P. Filzmoser,et al.  Outlier Detection for Compositional Data Using Robust Methods , 2008 .

[2]  M. Lacorde,et al.  Understanding Geology and Structure: An Essential Part of Mineral Resource Estimation , 2018, ASEG Extended Abstracts.

[3]  Leonard McMillan,et al.  Post-rendering 3D warping , 1997, SI3D.

[4]  Christoph Stiller,et al.  Object-oriented video coding employing dense motion fields , 1994, Proceedings of ICASSP '94. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[5]  Andrew Nealen,et al.  Physically Based Deformable Models in Computer Graphics , 2006, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[6]  W. J. Mead Notes on the Mechanics of Geologic Structures , 1920, The Journal of geology.

[7]  Raymond Leung,et al.  Modelling Orebody Structures: Block Merging Algorithms and Block Model Spatial Restructuring Strategies Given Mesh Surfaces of Geological Boundaries , 2020, J. Spatial Inf. Sci..

[8]  Pierre Briole,et al.  3D displacement maps of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake (Italy) by applying the SISTEM method to GPS and DInSAR data , 2013 .

[9]  Pierre Alliez,et al.  Polygon Mesh Processing , 2010 .

[10]  Pierre Moulin,et al.  Optical flow techniques applied to video coding , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  C. Griffiths,et al.  Recent development in stratigraphic forward modelling and its application in petroleum exploration , 2015 .

[12]  David S. Taubman,et al.  Lifting-based invertible motion adaptive transform (LIMAT) framework for highly scalable video compression , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  Gunnar Farnebäck,et al.  Very High Accuracy Velocity Estimation using Orientation Tensors Parametric Motion and Simultaneous Segmentation of the Motion Field , 2001, ICCV.

[14]  Christian Rössl,et al.  Laplacian surface editing , 2004, SGP '04.

[15]  A. Murat Tekalp,et al.  Simultaneous motion estimation and segmentation , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[17]  G. Caumon,et al.  Surface-Based 3D Modeling of Geological Structures , 2009 .