Can Radiographs Predict Outcome in Patients With Idiopathic Clubfeet Treated With the Ponseti Method?

Background: The aim of this study was to determine if radiographic measurements, taken before tenotomy, can predict outcome in children with idiopathic clubfoot treated by the Ponseti method. Methods: A retrospective chart and radiographic review was performed on children with idiopathic clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method over a 10-year period with minimum 2-year follow-up that had a forced dorsiflexion lateral foot radiograph before tenotomy. All angles were measured in duplicate on the pretenotomy radiographs, including: foot dorsiflexion (defined as the 90 minus the angle between the tibial shaft and a plastic plate used to dorsiflex the foot), tibio-calcaneal, talo-calcaneal, and talo-first metatarsal angles. Clinical review of patient records identified different patient outcomes: no additional treatment required, relapse (additional casting and/or surgery required), recurrence (any additional surgery required), or reconstruction (surgery not including repeat tenotomy). Results: Forty-five patients (71 feet) were included in the study. The median age at follow-up was 4.6 years. The intrareader reliability was acceptable for all measures. Thirteen of the 71 (18%) feet required additional surgery, occurring at a median age of 3.6 years. Of the 4 radiographic measures, only pretenotomy foot dorsiflexion predicted recurrence (hazard ratio=0.96, P=0.03). Youden’s method identified 16.6 degrees of dorsiflexion as the optimal cutoff. Feet with at least that amount of dorsiflexion pretenotomy (n=21) experienced no recurrences; feet with less than that amount of dorsiflexion (n=50) experienced 13 recurrences (P=0.007). Conclusions: Reduced foot dorsiflexion on lateral forced dorsiflexion pretenotomy radiograph was associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Radiographic dorsiflexion to 15 degrees past neutral before tenotomy appears to predict successful treatment via the Ponseti method. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

[1]  Soo-Sung Park,et al.  Predictive factors for residual equinovarus deformity following Ponseti treatment and percutaneous Achilles tenotomy for idiopathic clubfoot , 2013, Acta orthopaedica.

[2]  F. Grill,et al.  Interobserver reliability of radiographic measurements of contralateral feet of pediatric patients with unilateral clubfoot. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  K. Alemdaroğlu,et al.  Treatment of clubfoot with the Ponseti method: should we begin casting in the newborn period or later? , 2010, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[4]  M. Halanski,et al.  Separating the chicken from the egg: an attempt to discern between clubfoot recurrences and incomplete corrections. , 2010, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[5]  Xue-cheng Liu,et al.  Reproducibility of radiographic measurements in assessment of congenital talipes equinovarus. , 2009, American journal of orthopedics.

[6]  P. Farsetti,et al.  CT Study on the Effect of Different Treatment Protocols for Clubfoot Pathology , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  F. Sekeramayi,et al.  A RELIABLE & VALID METHOD OF ASSESSING THE AMOUNT OF DEFORMITY IN THE CONGENITAL CLUBFOOT DEFORMITY , 2008 .

[8]  A. Siapkara,et al.  Congenital talipes equinovarus: a review of current management. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  C. Walker,et al.  Early clubfoot recurrence after use of the Ponseti method in a New Zealand population. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  M. Fridman,et al.  The role of radiographic measurements in the evaluation of congenital clubfoot surgical results , 2007, Skeletal Radiology.

[11]  J. Morcuende,et al.  Treatment of the Complex Idiopathic Clubfoot , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  N. Davis,et al.  The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  C. Tylkowski,et al.  Tarsal Shape, Size, and Articulating Surface Morphology in Adolescent Surgically Treated Clubfoot and Their Contralateral Normal Foot , 2006, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[14]  D. Wenger.  Congenital Clubfoot: Fundamentals of Treatment , 1997 .

[15]  A. Diméglio,et al.  Classification of Clubfoot , 1995, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[16]  S J Laaveg,et al.  Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.